Re: Issue 2709 in sympy: logcombine isn't as simple as it could be

2013-05-22 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #3 on issue 2709 by smi...@gmail.com: logcombine isn't as simple as it could be http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2709 logcombine(log(2)/(log(x)+log(y))) log(2**(1/log(x*y))) -- You received this message because this project is

Re: Issue 2709 in sympy: logcombine isn't as simple as it could be

2013-04-30 Thread sympy
Comment #2 on issue 2709 by smi...@gmail.com: logcombine isn't as simple as it could be http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2709 The issue is that logcombine does not work with the deep concept, so bottom_up can/should be used if that is desired (or logcombine modified to

Issue 2709 in sympy: logcombine isn't as simple as it could be

2011-09-28 Thread sympy
Status: Accepted Owner: smi...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2709 by smi...@gmail.com: logcombine isn't as simple as it could be http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2709 var('x y',positive=True) (x, y) logcombine(log(2)/(log(x)+log(y)))