Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2953 by someb...@bluewin.ch: Limits of Meijerg
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2953
The limit(...) function fails when we try to compute the limit of
an expression involving meijerg functions. The failure
Updates:
Cc: ness...@gmail.com
Comment #1 on issue 2953 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Limits of Meijerg
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2953
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" gr
Comment #2 on issue 2953 by ness...@gmail.com: Limits of Meijerg
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2953
Whenever you get a strange result from "limit", try "gruntz" instead. For
the bessel case it will tell you that asymptotic series expansions are not
implemented for besseli.
Comment #3 on issue 2953 by someb...@bluewin.ch: Limits of Meijerg
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2953
With the mathematical side you are right for sure.
I never really expected a good result. But the "limit"
function should not fail with such a python error.
(Rather return an u
Updates:
Labels: Series
Comment #4 on issue 2953 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Limits of Meijerg
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2953
IMHO, both should return a Limit object. oo*besseli(1, -2*sqrt(1/x)) is
confusing and meaningless at best, and wrong at worst (it shouldn't ha
Comment #6 on issue 2953 by skirpic...@gmail.com: Limits of Meijerg
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2953
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2037
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust yo
Updates:
Status: Started
Cc: -ness...@googlemail.com
Comment #7 on issue 2953 by someb...@bluewin.ch: Limits of Meijerg
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2953
At least for this example the result now makes sense:
In [17]: G
Out[17]: meijerg(((), ()), ((1,), (0,)),
