Status: Accepted
Owner:
CC: smi...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3064 by ness...@gmail.com: Factor_terms inconsistency
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3064
In [1]: a, b, s = symbols('a b s')
In [2]: 1/gamma(a/2+b/2-s+1)
Out[2]:
1
───
Comment #1 on issue 3064 by smi...@gmail.com: Factor_terms inconsistency
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3064
Although factor_terms will not introduce coefficients on terms that have no
denominator, gcd_terms does. And once it does it's hard to recover from the
damage as a re
Comment #2 on issue 3064 by ness...@gmail.com: Factor_terms inconsistency
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3064
Thank you!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy-issues@googleg
Comment #3 on issue 3064 by smi...@gmail.com: Factor_terms inconsistency
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3064
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1049
I'm running test. I reset the option to clear=True so (x/2 + 1) -> (x +
2)/2 by default. One may call factor_terms(e, clear=0)
Comment #4 on issue 3064 by ness...@gmail.com: Factor_terms inconsistency
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3064
My preference is not to pull it out (mainly because then I would have to
type all test results with evaluate=False everywhere), but as long as there
is an option I d
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #5 on issue 3064 by smi...@gmail.com: Factor_terms inconsistency
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3064
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" gro
