Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Polynomial EasyToFix
New issue 3085 by asmeu...@gmail.com: poly() does not respect the given
order of generators
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3085
In [109]: Poly(x*y*z, y, z, x)
Out[109]: Poly(y*z*x, y, z, x,
Comment #1 on issue 3085 by smi...@gmail.com: poly() does not respect the
given order of generators
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3085
I would expect them to be canonical (both x, y, z) but I would expect Poly
to put them in canonical order. A polynomial is not like an Int
Comment #2 on issue 3085 by matt...@gmail.com: poly() does not respect the
given order of generators
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3085
It is. Example: Groebner bases. Poly doesn't change the order of variables,
because it is an important element of ordering of monomials (
Comment #3 on issue 3085 by asmeu...@gmail.com: poly() does not respect the
given order of generators
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3085
Aside from that, it would be very annoying to have to check what order the
generators ended up in each time you created a poly, and coul
Comment #4 on issue 3085 by smi...@gmail.com: poly() does not respect the
given order of generators
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3085
Sorry...I didn't see the difference in caps (poly vs Poly).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"
Updates:
Labels: -EasyToFix NeedsReview smichr
Comment #5 on issue 3085 by smi...@gmail.com: poly() does not respect the
given order of generators
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3085
The gens were not being passed on to reorder.
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/10
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #6 on issue 3085 by smi...@gmail.com: poly() does not respect the
given order of generators
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3085
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo
