Re: Issue 3109 in sympy: sqrt(exp(4*a)) != exp(2*a)

2012-03-20 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #8 on issue 3109 by smi...@gmail.com: sqrt(exp(4*a)) != exp(2*a) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3109 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues

Re: Issue 3109 in sympy: sqrt(exp(4*a)) != exp(2*a)

2012-03-15 Thread sympy
Comment #6 on issue 3109 by smi...@gmail.com: sqrt(exp(4*a)) != exp(2*a) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3109 Mul._eval_power also has an error that leads to the following failure: e=-sqrt(3)*(1+2*I) sqrt(e.n()).n() 1.03463339851334 - 1.6740720046904*I

Re: Issue 3109 in sympy: sqrt(exp(4*a)) != exp(2*a)

2012-03-14 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: -Priority-Medium Priority-Critical Comment #5 on issue 3109 by smi...@gmail.com: sqrt(exp(4*a)) != exp(2*a) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3109 There are problems with how Pow.as_numer_denom works that leads to the following error: print

Re: Issue 3109 in sympy: sqrt(exp(4*a)) != exp(2*a)

2012-03-05 Thread sympy
Comment #3 on issue 3109 by asmeu...@gmail.com: sqrt(exp(4*a)) != exp(2*a) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3109 it would be helpful if someone can prove that the experimentally determined criteria `abs(e) S.Pi/log(b)` is sufficient to ensure that `(b**e)**a` == `b**(e*a)`

Re: Issue 3109 in sympy: sqrt(exp(4*a)) != exp(2*a)

2012-03-05 Thread sympy
Comment #4 on issue 3109 by smi...@gmail.com: sqrt(exp(4*a)) != exp(2*a) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3109 No assumptions on b; it can be complex. And the rhs should be abs(pi/log(b)). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues

Re: Issue 3109 in sympy: sqrt(exp(4*a)) != exp(2*a)

2012-03-04 Thread sympy
Comment #2 on issue 3109 by smi...@gmail.com: sqrt(exp(4*a)) != exp(2*a) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3109 https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1105 has changes which modify power rules. Tom might want to take a look since there are exp_polar related changes; and it would