Comment #3 on issue 363 by smi...@gmail.com: split() method
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=363
(x+y+z).split('+') # = .as_two_terms()
(x, y+z)
(x+y+z).split('+', flatten=True) # = .args
(x, y, z)
(x+y+z).split('*') # Mul.make_args()
(x + y + z, 1)
(x+y+z).split('*', coeff
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Labels: CodeInCategory-Code CodeInDifficulty-Medium
Comment #4 on issue 363 by asmeu...@gmail.com: split() method
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=363
Sure, why not.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gr
Comment #5 on issue 363 by asmeu...@gmail.com: split() method
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=363
We should allow the syntax (x + y + z).split(Add).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this group, send em
Updates:
Labels: CodeInImportedIntoSpreadsheet
Comment #6 on issue 363 by krastano...@gmail.com: split() method
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=363
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sy
Comment #8 on issue 363 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: split() method
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=363
I don't really understand the idea here. This looks just like a duplicate
of (Add|Mul).make_args().
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #9 on issue 363 by asmeu...@gmail.com: split() method
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=363
Hmm. I think you're right. Chris, do you still see this as useful? If so,
please reopen.
I've unpublished the GCI task for now.
--
You received
