Status: NeedsDecision
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3639 by mrock...@gmail.com: Should we remove old assumptions?
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3639
rlamy says
I think it would be a serious mistake to throw away a working system (the
old assumptio
Updates:
Cc: ronan.l...@gmail.com
Labels: Assumptions
Comment #1 on issue 3639 by mrock...@gmail.com: Should we remove old
assumptions?
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3639
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this pro
Issue 3639: Should we remove old assumptions?
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3639
This issue is now blocking issue sympy:3631.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3631
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or
Comment #3 on issue 3639 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Should we remove old
assumptions?
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3639
The issue is, can we refactor the core (or really do anything with it) if
it still has the old assumptions sitting around.
Now, a phase out period could b
Comment #4 on issue 3639 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Should we remove old
assumptions?
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3639
It depends what sort of refactoring you have in mind. Having the old
assumptions around is not a problem in itself, IMO.
--
You received this message be
Comment #5 on issue 3639 by mrock...@gmail.com: Should we remove old
assumptions?
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3639
It would be nice to remove some of the magic around Symbol.
What will sympy use in general code? What will `is_positive` call? Old
assumptions or new ass
Comment #6 on issue 3639 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Should we remove old
assumptions?
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3639
Yes, this a real problem that could be fixed quite easily today (by having
the new assumptions call the old ones), were it not for the fact that there
a
