Re: Issue 905 in sympy: series error: maximum recursion depth exceeded

2011-04-03 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #15 on issue 905 by Vinzent.Steinberg: series error: maximum recursion depth exceeded http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=905 It's in. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group. To post

Re: Issue 905 in sympy: series error: maximum recursion depth exceeded

2011-03-30 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview Comment #14 on issue 905 by pr...@goodok.ru: series error: maximum recursion depth exceeded http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=905 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are

Re: Issue 905 in sympy: series error: maximum recursion depth exceeded

2011-03-28 Thread sympy
Comment #11 on issue 905 by asmeurer: series error: maximum recursion depth exceeded http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=905 What exactly do you need comment on? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group. To post to this

Re: Issue 905 in sympy: series error: maximum recursion depth exceeded

2011-03-28 Thread sympy
Comment #12 on issue 905 by pr...@goodok.ru: series error: maximum recursion depth exceeded http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=905 What exactly do you need comment on? First of all, is all ok with this issue. In particular, have anyone objections or not about this lines:

Re: Issue 905 in sympy: series error: maximum recursion depth exceeded

2011-03-27 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: NeedsDecision Cc: ronan.l...@gmail.com smi...@gmail.com Comment #10 on issue 905 by pr...@goodok.ru: series error: maximum recursion depth exceeded http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=905 See my comments there. The opinion of myself, yes,

Re: Issue 905 in sympy: series error: maximum recursion depth exceeded

2011-03-26 Thread sympy
Comment #8 on issue 905 by ness...@googlemail.com: series error: maximum recursion depth exceeded http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=905 Thanks for the comments. There was a bug in my code (only checking for oo, not I*oo etc). Now all your examples either return the expected

Re: Issue 905 in sympy: series error: maximum recursion depth exceeded

2011-03-26 Thread sympy
Comment #9 on issue 905 by asmeurer: series error: maximum recursion depth exceeded http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=905 Feel free to modify the labels in the issues as you see fit. For example, you could change NeedsReview to NeedsBetterPatch if you see a problem with a

Re: Issue 905 in sympy: series error: maximum recursion depth exceeded

2011-03-25 Thread sympy
Comment #4 on issue 905 by ness...@googlemail.com: series error: maximum recursion depth exceeded http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=905 I sent out a pull request for a fix, see https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/163. -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: Issue 905 in sympy: series error: maximum recursion depth exceeded

2011-03-25 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: NeedsReview ness987 Comment #5 on issue 905 by asmeurer: series error: maximum recursion depth exceeded http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=905 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: Issue 905 in sympy: series error: maximum recursion depth exceeded

2011-03-25 Thread sympy
Comment #6 on issue 905 by pr...@goodok.ru: series error: maximum recursion depth exceeded http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=905 I have carried out more tests and detected. Master branch: acos(1-x).series(x) nan acos(1+x).series(x) nan

Re: Issue 905 in sympy: series error: maximum recursion depth exceeded

2011-03-25 Thread sympy
Comment #7 on issue 905 by pr...@goodok.ru: series error: maximum recursion depth exceeded http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=905 About comparison of `acos(1-x*x).series(x)` - it is correct, remarking that branches of function (issue 564) it is a separate issue, and remarking