> Yes, I am aware of that. Thanks for your patches, I'll try it and see
> where the bottleneck is. Btw in your first patch, you seem to have a
> bogus line (with kwargs), which is not used anywhere, unless I am
> missing something.
>
> Ondrej
That was indeed an error. It is fixed in this new pa
Thanks for your swift responses, I've got some comments:
> * In various places you use the variable "str." This is dangerous as
> str is a builtin type (a string).
Absolutely, It should be substituted immediately.
> * It is a little awkward to have the occupation #'s stored differently
> for b
Ooops! I have to correct myself:
> The reason I chose the sparse format for the Fermionic case was not
> because of storage considerations. Rather because I wanted to treat
> problems without depending on the number of particles and the size of
> the model space. I believe the framework will be
