On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 3:50 AM, jegerjensen wrote:
>
> Ooops! I have to correct myself:
>
>> The reason I chose the sparse format for the Fermionic case was not
>> because of storage considerations. Rather because I wanted to treat
>> problems without depending on the number of particles and the
Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 3:50 AM, jegerjensen wrote:
>
>> Ooops! I have to correct myself:
>>
>>
>>> The reason I chose the sparse format for the Fermionic case was not
>>> because of storage considerations. Rather because I wanted to treat
>>> problems without depend
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Alan Bromborsky wrote:
>
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 3:50 AM, jegerjensen wrote:
>>
>>> Ooops! I have to correct myself:
>>>
>>>
The reason I chose the sparse format for the Fermionic case was not
because of storage considerations.
