SymTuple did not fulfill foo.func(*foo.args) == foo. This patch fixes that
by storing the wrapped tuple as .args[0] instead of directly as .args
Updated all SymTuple methods, added a test and fixed some whitespace.
---
sympy/physics/secondquant.py| 35
Thanks for your comments. I created another patch, which by accident
ended up in a new thread. Lets continue this discussion there.
Øyvind
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To post to this group, send email to
The above patch was my response to Ondrejs comment:
Well,
I am not sure that the change from:
-assert st == SymTuple((1,2,3,4))
to:
+assert st == SymTuple(1, 2, 3, 4)
is a good idea. In fact I think it's a bad idea, as we migrated from
Matrix(1,2, 3, 4) syntax to Matrix([1, 2, 3, 4]).
Le vendredi 30 avril 2010 à 14:23 -0700, Ondrej Certik a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 6:26 AM, jegerjensen jensen.oyv...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, shouldn't this go into sympy.core?
Ondrej
That is probably a good idea. Where should we put the decorator
_tuple_wrapper? Or should
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Ronan Lamy ronan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Le vendredi 30 avril 2010 à 14:23 -0700, Ondrej Certik a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 6:26 AM, jegerjensen jensen.oyv...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, shouldn't this go into sympy.core?
Ondrej
That is probably a
Le vendredi 30 avril 2010 à 16:06 -0700, Ondrej Certik a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Ronan Lamy ronan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Le vendredi 30 avril 2010 à 14:23 -0700, Ondrej Certik a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 6:26 AM, jegerjensen jensen.oyv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Also,
