In the meanwhile, I've used Øyvind's hint to create branches numbered
as to commit number for all the commits in review and pushed them to
github. In cases where there are additions (like 1725a 1725b 1725c,
those are all in branch 1725).
ff50ca5 1936: Integral and Sum edits
c2a77c6 1919: unify var
2010/5/11 smichr
> >
> > I hope I am not adding confusion here, but I think Vincent just asked
> > for something like
> >
> > ]$ git branch 1766-for-review ff50ca5221a22e9b80d1
> >
> > Øyvind
>
> That's a helpful hint Øyvind. I see that that creates a branch with
> the indicated commit as the HEA
>
> I hope I am not adding confusion here, but I think Vincent just asked
> for something like
>
> ]$ git branch 1766-for-review ff50ca5221a22e9b80d1
>
> Øyvind
That's a helpful hint Øyvind. I see that that creates a branch with
the indicated commit as the HEAD. I'm willing to do what is most
help
ti., 11.05.2010 kl. 02.36 -0700, skrev smichr:
> > > As I already said, it would be much easier if you could create another
> > > branch for review (1766-for-review) which contains only "stable" changes.
> > > This would help to get it in faster.
>
> The commits before "1766--"
>
> Do all tests (including the code quality) work for you? If so, we need
> to improve this.
You said "without the first commit". Do you mean without the latest
commit? In any case, all solvers.py tests pass in all commits. The
equal() can be used too make these pass on 32 or 64 bit systems if
n
> > As I already said, it would be much easier if you could create another
> > branch for review (1766-for-review) which contains only "stable" changes.
> > This would help to get it in faster.
The commits before "1766--" are stable. I am not
changing those. I am only, as revie
