Re: Issue 1694 in sympy: solve has many issues with fractions

Comment #165 on issue 1694 by nicolas.pourcelot: solve has many issues with fractions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1694 "Labels: NeedsReview Blockedon: 1923 1936 1987" I don't understand: is this blocked by new issues, or do you mean that you also fixed those issues in y

Re: Issue 1960 in sympy: should repr form of geometry entities be the same as str?

Comment #14 on issue 1960 by asmeurer: should repr form of geometry entities be the same as str? http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1960 Actually, it's issue 1348, and Mateusz fixed it in his polys branch (af4c122689a31a1e8546b9bb73bbcb03578c6ada). -- You received this messag

Re: Issue 1960 in sympy: should repr form of geometry entities be the same as str?

Comment #13 on issue 1960 by asmeurer: should repr form of geometry entities be the same as str? http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1960 I see. I didn't realize that str(list) used repr(). By the way, that reminds me that we still have that srepr(sqrt(x)) == Pow(Symbol('x'),

Re: Issue 1960 in sympy: should repr form of geometry entities be the same as str?

Comment #12 on issue 1960 by Vinzent.Steinberg: should repr form of geometry entities be the same as str? http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1960 I think in sympy we have repr() == str(), because str([...]) uses repr() to print all elements inside the list, which is usually not

Re: Issue 1960 in sympy: should repr form of geometry entities be the same as str?

Comment #11 on issue 1960 by asmeurer: should repr form of geometry entities be the same as str? http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1960 Wait, why is ok to break repr() but not srepr()? Actually, I'm not sure I really understand the subtle difference between the two. -- You

Re: Issue 1960 in sympy: should repr form of geometry entities be the same as str?

Updates: Labels: -PassedReview NeedsBetterPatch Comment #10 on issue 1960 by Vinzent.Steinberg: should repr form of geometry entities be the same as str? http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1960 There is a problem: srepr(Line(Point(2, 2), Point(0, 10)).intersection(Line(P

[PATCH 1/1] patches-tut docs: fix git path and add gmail option for sendmail

--- doc/src/sympy-patches-tutorial.txt | 22 -- 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/src/sympy-patches-tutorial.txt b/doc/src/sympy-patches-tutorial.txt index 4e42747..78d484a 100644 --- a/doc/src/sympy-patches-tutorial.txt +++ b/doc/src/sympy-

Re: Issue 1694 in sympy: solve has many issues with fractions

Comment #164 on issue 1694 by smichr: solve has many issues with fractions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1694 I'll put a pull request in later today. For now it is at github/smichr branch 1694. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "s

Re: Issue 1923 in sympy: count_ops doesn't return a count (by default)

Issue 1923: count_ops doesn't return a count (by default) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1923 This issue is now blocking issue 1694. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1694 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this iss

Re: Issue 1987 in sympy: Integral(f(x), (x, g(x), h(x))).diff(x) incorrectly returns 0

Issue 1987: Integral(f(x), (x, g(x), h(x))).diff(x) incorrectly returns 0 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1987 This issue is now blocking issue 1694. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1694 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC f

Re: Issue 1694 in sympy: solve has many issues with fractions

Updates: Labels: NeedsReview Blockedon: 1923 1936 1987 Comment #163 on issue 1694 by smichr: solve has many issues with fractions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1694 OK, I've pulled out the multi-equation handling and added only a little tsolve material besides

Re: Issue 1936 in sympy: Integral limits should be sanitized

Issue 1936: Integral limits should be sanitized http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1936 This issue is now blocking issue 1694. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1694 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or bec

[GitHub] MathML output for relational operators [sympy/sympy GH-33]

markdewing wants someone to pull from markdewing:mathml-relational: Add MathML output for the relational operators. View Pull Request: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/33 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-patches" group. To post to this grou