Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #1 on issue 2127 by smichr: don't allow 0 or 1-arg AssocOp
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2127
This is part of the branch under review, a commit with the number 2127:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/50
--
You received this messa
Updates:
Blockedon: 2127
Comment #11 on issue 1917 by smichr: 1917: misc edits
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1917
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-patches" group.
To post to t
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsReview -smichr PassedReview
Comment #10 on issue 1917 by asmeurer: 1917: misc edits
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1917
I too was a little perplexed by the C stuff, but I think that is a bigger
issue, as noted in comment 7. Anyway, over at the p
Comment #15 on issue 2125 by asmeurer: Using Integers as python slices.
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2125
Ah, sorry, I read the code wrong. Never mind that comment.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-patches" group.
To post t
Comment #6 on issue 1980 by smichr: has, has_any_symbols, has_all_symbols
unified
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1980
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/51
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-patches" group.
To post to this
smichr wants someone to pull from smichr:1980:
has() has been optimized and defaults to has_any.
all tests pass here and all lines (except the legacy handling of iterables that
maybe encountered) are covered.
View Pull Request: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/51
--
You received this messa
Comment #9 on issue 1917 by smichr: 1917: misc edits
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1917
It doesn't appear to make much difference whether C or Symbol is used
(according to the following test) but importing in a function is much worse:
import C
def foo():
C.Symbol("X")
foo(
smichr wants someone to pull from smichr:1917:
These are code clean-up edits that would be great to get in before 0.7. Most
are just a line or two in a given file so it isn't heavy reviewing. The good
news is that with these changes there will be 31 less lines to review in the
future.
26 file
Comment #14 on issue 2125 by nicolas.pourcelot: Using Integers as python
slices.
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2125
@Aaron:
"There's no point in testing it five times in Python 2.5+, so I would move
the for loop into the else block."
Sorry, I don't understand what you me
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #4 on issue 2126 by smichr: fix doctest or quality testing to
recognize doctests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2126
The bare exception hiding this was corrected. There are 2 other bare
exceptions waiting to cause problems if som
smichr wants someone to pull from smichr:doctest:
Doctests that had bad formatting (i.e. were not triple quote or blank line
terminated) now flag an error during doctests. This identified a problem with
an existing doctest that was corrected.
View Pull Request: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pu
11 matches
Mail list logo
