Updates:
Blockedon: 2114
Comment #12 on issue 1917 by smichr: 1917: misc edits
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1917
In 1917 I make the following edit which fails unless it is further modified
or make_args always returns something:
old
-if expr.is_Mul:
Comment #4 on issue 1818 by smichr: coeff and collect failures on x**(1+x)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1818
regarding comment 1: the 2-arg mul behavior gets you here since the 3 gets
distributed into the Add so there is no 1 + x term. You would have to
factor the expressi
smichr wants someone to pull from smichr:1980:
The performance of has() is upgraded in this branch; duplicating code was
removed. This, rather than inspecting atoms, is the faster method to use to see
if something has something else.
View Pull Request: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/52
--
smichr wants someone to pull from smichr:1804etc:
This introduces noncommutative handling to coeff, as_coefficient, and
as_independent. It is blocked on 1980 which is included here for testing
purposes, but only the last two commits need be considered here.
View Pull Request: https://github.com
Comment #3 on issue 1804 by smichr: as_independent could respect
non-commutatives
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1804
See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/53
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-patches" group.
To post to th
Updates:
Blockedon: 1980
Comment #4 on issue 1804 by smichr: as_independent could respect
non-commutatives
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1804
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sym
Issue 1980: has, has_any_symbols, has_all_symbols unified
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1980
This issue is now blocking issue 1804.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1804
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this iss
Issue 1980: has, has_any_symbols, has_all_symbols unified
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1980
This issue is now blocking issue 1835.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1835
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this iss
Updates:
Blockedon: -1766 1980 2114
Comment #5 on issue 1835 by smichr: 1835: coeff changes
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1835
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/53
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-patches" group.
To
Issue 1766: expand(power_base=True) is too aggressive
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1766
This issue is no longer blocking issue 1835.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1835
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this is
Updates:
Blockedon: 1980 2114
Comment #5 on issue 1818 by smichr: coeff and collect failures on x**(1+x)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1818
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/53
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-patch
Issue 1980: has, has_any_symbols, has_all_symbols unified
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1980
This issue is now blocking issue 1818.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1818
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this iss
12 matches
Mail list logo
