jegerjensen wants someone to pull from jegerjensen:nowrap2:
This patch fixes Issue 2059, and nothing more.
The practical benefit is that, in order to use Idx objects as indices, they
must be constructed explicitly. Before, an integer symbol would be silently
converted to Idx by the Indexed
Comment #19 on issue 2059 by jensen.o...@gmail.com: Indexed should not wrap
indices in Idx
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2059
I uploaded a simpler fix in pull request
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/95
It would be great to get this into 7.0 so that people don't
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview smichr
Comment #1 on issue 2165 by smi...@gmail.com: Pow.is_bounded could handle
more cases
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2165
see [ https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/61 ], commit with number 2165
--
You received this message because
Comment #2 on issue 2161 by smi...@gmail.com: powsimp should look for base,
1/base pairs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2161
see commit number 2161 in [ https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/61 ]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Status: Accepted
Owner: smi...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium NeedsReview smichr
New issue 2168 by smi...@gmail.com: subs wart
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2168
All subs should have a quick exit; most do. Commit 2168 in the following
adds this exit to those
Updates:
Labels: Assumptions
Comment #3 on issue 2165 by asmeurer: Pow.is_bounded could handle more cases
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2165
Doesn't is_bounded just mean that the expression is bounded over its
domain? For example, if x is real, then cos(x) is
Comment #4 on issue 1944 by smi...@gmail.com: limit() returns incorrect
answer for limit(exp(-x/a), x, oo)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1944
In the current pull/61 this gives:
h[1] limit(exp(-x/a),x,oo)
nan
h[2] var('a', positive=True)
a
h[3]
Comment #5 on issue 2165 by smi...@gmail.com: Pow.is_bounded could handle
more cases
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2165
It's needed to handle limits when you need to decide which terms can be
discarded. If you restore the routine to master in my 2084 branch and run
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsBetterPatch NeedsReview
Comment #36 on issue 2039 by smi...@gmail.com: Mul.eval_subs problems
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2039
It's good to go again.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches
Comment #14 on issue 2130 by smi...@gmail.com: wrong limit
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2130
How now?
h[1] limit(Sum(1/x, (x, 1, n))-1/n, n, oo)
Sum(1/x, (x, 1, oo))
h[2] limit(Sum(1/x, (x, 1, n))-log(n), n, oo)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
Comment #37 on issue 1646 by asmeurer: Solving inequalities
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1646
Is there a way to make solve return an Interval rather than an And of
inequalities. That was the whole point in writing the intervals module at
the top of this issue.
At the
Updates:
Labels: smichr NeedsReview
Comment #7 on issue 412 by smi...@gmail.com: series bug: 1/x -
(x**(-3)-1)**Rational(1,3) returns only one term
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=412
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you
Updates:
Labels: smichr NeedsReview
Comment #4 on issue 431 by smi...@gmail.com: series bug: w**(-1-w) *
sin(2*w)**(1+w)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=431
When [ https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/61 ] is finished will be
resolved.
--
You received this message
Updates:
Labels: smichr NeedsReview
Comment #15 on issue 895 by smi...@gmail.com: series method does not work
if the point is not 0
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=895
With [ https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/61 ] this is resolved.
--
You received this message
Comment #5 on issue 1944 by smi...@gmail.com: limit() returns incorrect
answer for limit(exp(-x/a), x, oo)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1944
With [ https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/61] this is resolved as noted
above.
--
You received this message because you are
Updates:
Labels: smichr NeedsReview
Comment #27 on issue 2085 by smi...@gmail.com: Limit code severely broken.
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2085
With [ https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/61 ] this is resolved.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
Comment #26 on issue 835 by smi...@gmail.com: limit((5**x+3**x)**(1/x), x,
oo) TODO
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=835
Rather, pull/61 AND changes indicated in issue 2162 (which is not up for
review yet) will resolve this.
--
You received this message because you are
17 matches
Mail list logo
