Comment #1 on issue 2199 by smi...@gmail.com: _new_rawargs should watch for
no args
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2199
see [ https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/114 ]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-patches" group.
To pos
new_rawargs should watch for [] args
The most anticipated case (len(args) > 1) is now put first
in _new_rawargs. In addition, the case of no args is now
handled. Tests were added.
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/114
--
You received this message because you are subscr
Status: Accepted
Owner: smi...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium smichr NeedsReview
New issue 2199 by smi...@gmail.com: _new_rawargs should watch for no args
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2199
new_rawargs should watch for [] args
The most anticipated ca
