Re: Issue 1230 in sympy: limit((tan x)**(tan 2x), x, pi/4) doesnt work

2011-03-01 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #9 on issue 1230 by smi...@gmail.com: limit((tan x)**(tan 2x), x, pi/4) doesnt work http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1230 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

5 issues changed in sympy

2011-03-01 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment by smi...@gmail.com: (No comment was entered for this change.) Affected issues: issue 412: series bug: 1/x - (x**(-3)-1)**Rational(1,3) returns only one term http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=412 issue 431: series bug: w**(-1-w)

Re: Issue 1944 in sympy: limit() returns incorrect answer for limit(exp(-x/a), x, oo)

2011-03-01 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #6 on issue 1944 by smi...@gmail.com: limit() returns incorrect answer for limit(exp(-x/a), x, oo) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1944 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: Issue 1269 in sympy: lseries hangs

2011-03-01 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #6 on issue 1269 by smi...@gmail.com: lseries hangs http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1269 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-patches group. To post

Re: Issue 2126 in sympy: fix doctest or quality testing to recognize doctests

2011-03-01 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #8 on issue 2126 by smi...@gmail.com: fix doctest or quality testing to recognize doctests http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2126 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: Issue 2084 in sympy: limit(1+1/x, x, 0, dir='-') fails

2011-03-01 Thread sympy
Comment #69 on issue 2084 by nicolas@gmail.com: limit(1+1/x, x, 0, dir='-') fails http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2084 Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. I labelled it fixed, since limit(1+1/x, x, 0, dir='-') - and similar limits - were fixed in your branch

Re: Issue 2171 in sympy: oo eats Integral

2011-03-01 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 2171 by smi...@gmail.com: oo eats Integral http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2171 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-patches group. To

Re: Issue 2084 in sympy: limit(1+1/x, x, 0, dir='-') fails

2011-03-01 Thread sympy
Comment #70 on issue 2084 by smi...@gmail.com: limit(1+1/x, x, 0, dir='-') fails http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2084 I'm sorry, I misunderstood. I don't think there was anything wrong with it. 2084 has come to be a catch-all for the series work in my head. Say, with the

[GitHub] Various codeprinting fixes [sympy/sympy GH-116]

2011-03-01 Thread jegerjensen
While using the code printing framework I have discovered a couple of nuisances, and I've collected fixes in this branch. Most patches are small and contain rather trivial changes. https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/116 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Issue 2201 in sympy: Mul.flatten drops nc_terms on reeval

2011-03-01 Thread sympy
Status: Accepted Owner: smi...@gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium NeedsReview smichr New issue 2201 by smi...@gmail.com: Mul.flatten drops nc_terms on reeval http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2201 The purpose of reeval is to update the c_part. But the nc_part should be

[GitHub] 2201 don't return reeval from Mul [sympy/sympy GH-117]

2011-03-01 Thread smichr
see [ http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2201 ] https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/117 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-patches group. To post to this group, send email to sympy-patches@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this

Re: Issue 2201 in sympy: Mul.flatten drops nc_terms on reeval

2011-03-01 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #1 on issue 2201 by smi...@gmail.com: Mul.flatten drops nc_terms on reeval http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2201 Thanks for checking this over, Julien Rioux. It's in. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google