Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #9 on issue 1230 by smi...@gmail.com: limit((tan x)**(tan 2x), x,
pi/4) doesnt work
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1230
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment by smi...@gmail.com:
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Affected issues:
issue 412: series bug: 1/x - (x**(-3)-1)**Rational(1,3) returns only one
term
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=412
issue 431: series bug: w**(-1-w)
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #6 on issue 1944 by smi...@gmail.com: limit() returns incorrect
answer for limit(exp(-x/a), x, oo)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1944
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #6 on issue 1269 by smi...@gmail.com: lseries hangs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1269
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To post
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #8 on issue 2126 by smi...@gmail.com: fix doctest or quality
testing to recognize doctests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2126
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Comment #69 on issue 2084 by nicolas@gmail.com: limit(1+1/x, x, 0,
dir='-') fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2084
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean.
I labelled it fixed, since limit(1+1/x, x, 0, dir='-') - and similar limits
- were fixed in your branch
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 2171 by smi...@gmail.com: oo eats Integral
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2171
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To
Comment #70 on issue 2084 by smi...@gmail.com: limit(1+1/x, x, 0, dir='-')
fails
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2084
I'm sorry, I misunderstood. I don't think there was anything wrong with
it. 2084 has come to be a catch-all for the series work in my head.
Say, with the
While using the code printing framework I have discovered a couple of
nuisances, and I've collected fixes in this branch. Most patches are small and
contain rather trivial changes.
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/116
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Status: Accepted
Owner: smi...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium NeedsReview smichr
New issue 2201 by smi...@gmail.com: Mul.flatten drops nc_terms on reeval
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2201
The purpose of reeval is to update the c_part. But the
nc_part should be
see [ http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2201 ]
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/117
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy-patches@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 2201 by smi...@gmail.com: Mul.flatten drops nc_terms on
reeval
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2201
Thanks for checking this over, Julien Rioux. It's in.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
12 matches
Mail list logo