Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #5 on issue 1782 by smi...@gmail.com: separatevars(((1 + 2*x +
x**2)*exp(y**2))/(x*y + y), [x, y], dict=True) doesn't work
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1782
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message becaus
Comment #14 on issue 1907 by smi...@gmail.com: Pow(..., evaluate=something)
is broken
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1907
c7's example should perhaps have been
Mul(*[-1,Pow(*[y,2],evaluate=True)],evaluate=True)
No expression that raised an error previously does so anymo
Comment #13 on issue 1907 by smi...@gmail.com: Pow(..., evaluate=something)
is broken
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1907
c7's example should perhaps have been
Mul(*[-1,Pow(*[y,2],evaluate=True)],evaluate=True)
No expression that raised an error previously does so anymo
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #12 on issue 1907 by smi...@gmail.com: Pow(..., evaluate=something)
is broken
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1907
c7's example should perhaps have been
Mul(*[-1,Pow(*[y,2],evaluate=True)],evaluate=True)
No expression that raised an
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #12 on issue 2246 by smi...@gmail.com: Global directive to switch
strict transformations
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2246
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 2399 by smi...@gmail.com: use free_symbols in
Integral.transform
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2399
this appears to be fixed:
if len(inverse_mapping) != 1 or x not in
inverse_mapping[0].free_symbols:
--
You received
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 2400 by smi...@gmail.com: use deep in simplify's
together call
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2400
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"symp
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #7 on issue 2405 by smi...@gmail.com: solve and solve_poly_system
can give ambiguous results
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2405
solve now returns a mapping
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 2652 by smi...@gmail.com: powsimp should give
preference to numerical exponent combination
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2652
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 2668 by smi...@gmail.com: when solving a poly system,
gens should be passed on
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2668
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog
Comment #3 on issue 2331 by smi...@gmail.com: Recursion error with
homogeneous_order(-log(x) + acosh(x), x)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2331
This is in. Thanks for the review, Aaron.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-patc
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 2013 by smi...@gmail.com: RuntimeError with
homogeneous_order(y - log(x), x, y)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2013
This is in. Thanks for the review, Aaron.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 2669 by smi...@gmail.com: geometry solve results are
thrown away when symbolic
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2669
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 2331 by smi...@gmail.com: Recursion error with
homogeneous_order(-log(x) + acosh(x), x)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2331
This is in. Thanks for the review, Aaron.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Comment #4 on issue 2485 by smi...@gmail.com: multiset_partitions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2485
the first issue has been resolved; the last 2 from the oP have not
(returning lists and returning duplicates).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Updates:
Labels: smichr NeedsReview
Comment #1 on issue 2331 by smi...@gmail.com: Recursion error with
homogeneous_order(-log(x) + acosh(x), x)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2331
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/657
--
You received this message because you are su
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview smichr
Comment #1 on issue 2013 by smi...@gmail.com: RuntimeError with
homogeneous_order(y - log(x), x, y)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2013
I ported the code to master.
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/657
--
You received this mess
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview smichr
Comment #9 on issue 1364 by smi...@gmail.com: simple equations involving
log()
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1364
this no longer fails with https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/656
--
You received this message because you are subsc
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview smichr
Comment #8 on issue 2236 by smi...@gmail.com: solve fails for polysys with
multiple solutions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2236
This now solves with https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/656
--
You received this message because yo
19 matches
Mail list logo
