Re: Issue 3102 in sympy: Piecewise subs of function fails

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #4 on issue 3102 by smi...@gmail.com: Piecewise subs of function fails http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3102 replacement of functions doesn't fail now. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-p

Re: Issue 3089 in sympy: (a**1.0).subs(a,b) -> b

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #1 on issue 3089 by smi...@gmail.com: (a**1.0).subs(a,b) -> b http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3089 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-patches" group

Re: Issue 3145 in sympy: simultaneous substitution

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #9 on issue 3145 by smi...@gmail.com: simultaneous substitution http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3145 simultaneous substitution is now part of master. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-patch

Re: Issue 2980 in sympy: (x + 2.0).subs(2, 3) gives x + 3

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #1 on issue 2980 by smi...@gmail.com: (x + 2.0).subs(2, 3) gives x + 3 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2980 an Integer no longer replaces a Float -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-patche

Re: Issue 2976 in sympy: Tuple can hold bool but subs fails

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #3 on issue 2976 by smi...@gmail.com: Tuple can hold bool but subs fails http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2976 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-

Re: Issue 3041 in sympy: tryring to replace a Tuple with subs fails

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #3 on issue 3041 by smi...@gmail.com: tryring to replace a Tuple with subs fails http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3041 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 1581 in sympy: subs(dict()) sometimes breaks

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #6 on issue 1581 by smi...@gmail.com: subs(dict()) sometimes breaks http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1581 that's keyword syntax (dict(x=3)) which Python parses as 'x'=3 so it doesn't conflict with any local x. The bias is for symbols in s

Re: Issue 2571 in sympy: Regression in Integral.subs

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #22 on issue 2571 by smi...@gmail.com: Regression in Integral.subs http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2571 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-patches"

Re: Issue 1102 in sympy: _subs_dict doesn't works with functions

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #5 on issue 1102 by smi...@gmail.com: _subs_dict doesn't works with functions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1102 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "s

Re: Issue 2749 in sympy: subs(Dict) does not work

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #3 on issue 2749 by smi...@gmail.com: subs(Dict) does not work http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2749 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-patches" grou

Re: Issue 2552 in sympy: (1/(x*y)).subs(x*y, whatever) doesn't work

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #34 on issue 2552 by smi...@gmail.com: (1/(x*y)).subs(x*y, whatever) doesn't work http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2552 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 2026 in sympy: Exact, algebraic, and integer_power substitution

Comment #30 on issue 2026 by smi...@gmail.com: Exact, algebraic, and integer_power substitution http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2026 documentation has been updated and 690 committed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-patches"

Re: Issue 666 in sympy: sorting of expressions makes subs_dict() fail

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #17 on issue 666 by smi...@gmail.com: sorting of expressions makes subs_dict() fail http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=666 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group

Re: Issue 3145 in sympy: simultaneous substitution

On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 5:59 AM, wrote: > > Comment #8 on issue 3145 by pr...@goodok.ru: simultaneous substitution > http://code.google.com/p/**sympy/issues/detail?id=3145 > > But I get a*oo even when it is not know whether `a<>0` or not. > >

Re: Issue 3145 in sympy: simultaneous substitution

Comment #8 on issue 3145 by pr...@goodok.ru: simultaneous substitution http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3145 But I get a*oo even when it is not know whether `a<>0` or not. About PR 609, I commented it (one critical remark). The wave of GCI covered us, and the new one approaching

Re: Issue 294 in sympy: Pass coverage_doctest.py

Comment #16 on issue 294 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Pass coverage_doctest.py http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=294 coverage_doctest was recently rewritten (see https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1114). Our total coverage as of right now is TOTAL SCORE for sympy: 29% (1460 of 48

Re: Issue 3145 in sympy: simultaneous substitution

Comment #7 on issue 3145 by smi...@gmail.com: simultaneous substitution http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3145 Implicitly this transformation assumes that a<>0. I'm not sure that it matters since if you let a == 0 you get nan, the same as if you do `S(0)/0`, and you get +/-oo

Re: Issue 3145 in sympy: simultaneous substitution

Comment #6 on issue 3145 by pr...@goodok.ru: simultaneous substitution http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3145 'static` is confusing (because it can be related with the programming scope) `accurate`, `careful` id blinded, but more better (in my opinion) is `before_evaluation` or

Re: Issue 3127 in sympy: rop should be rop_cls in Relational.__new__

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #1 on issue 3127 by smi...@gmail.com: rop should be rop_cls in Relational.__new__ http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3127 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 3114 in sympy: x._random() returns None if x.is_positive is True

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #1 on issue 3114 by smi...@gmail.com: x._random() returns None if x.is_positive is True http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3114 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Issue 2057 in sympy: Units do not work together with evalf?

Updates: Labels: Evalf Comment #7 on issue 2057 by smi...@gmail.com: Units do not work together with evalf? http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2057 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sy

Re: Issue 1102 in sympy: _subs_dict doesn't works with functions

Updates: Labels: NeedsReview smichr Comment #4 on issue 1102 by smi...@gmail.com: _subs_dict doesn't works with functions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1102 f(x).subs(f, g) -> g(x) in https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/690 -- You received this message because you a

Re: Issue 3145 in sympy: simultaneous substitution

Comment #5 on issue 3145 by smi...@gmail.com: simultaneous substitution http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3145 "simultaneous=True" seems like a better keyword to me. what about 'static' (as in "subsequent replacements don't affect former replacements" and "all replacement is d

Re: Issue 3145 in sympy: simultaneous substitution

Comment #4 on issue 3145 by pr...@goodok.ru: simultaneous substitution http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3145 Upon XFAIL I meant `(sqrt(a/b)).subs([(a,0),(b,0)]) <> (sqrt(a/b)).subs(reversed([(a,0),(b,0)]))` -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Issue 3145 in sympy: simultaneous substitution

Comment #3 on issue 3145 by pr...@goodok.ru: simultaneous substitution http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3145 First of all, I think that it is problem in the assumption system or in the cancellation or in the automatic simplification of a*1/S.Zero --> a*oo a*1/S.Zero oo*a wh

Re: Issue 1296 in sympy: some problem with notcommutative algebra

Updates: Labels: NeedsReview Comment #9 on issue 1296 by julien.r...@gmail.com: some problem with notcommutative algebra http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1296 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl

Re: Issue 3145 in sympy: simultaneous substitution

Comment #2 on issue 3145 by julien.r...@gmail.com: simultaneous substitution http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3145 "simultaneous=True" seems like a better keyword to me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-patches" group. To post t

Re: Issue 3099 in sympy: Expr.is_constant() is very slow in some cases

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #7 on issue 3099 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Expr.is_constant() is very slow in some cases http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3099 This was merged. Even though the core tests still hang a little bit on a few points, I take it this can be close