It has been a while since I looked at this, but I went ahead and
implemented what Ronan suggested. The branch is on my git hub:
http://github.com/hazelnusse/sympy/tree/expand_neg_int_powers
It passes all tests on my machine.
Let me know what you think.
~Luke
On Aug 9, 7:24 pm, Aaron S
Attached is the patch that implements the change from 'lines' to
'rows' in the Matrix class.
I'll have the other one finished soon, hopefully git doesn't bite me.
~Luke
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Lukehazelnu...@gmail.com wrote:
Ondrej and I cooked this patch up together while we were
in order to separate the two main things we did while working
on this branch. I guess we should have thought of this when we were
working.
~Luke
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Lukehazelnu...@gmail.com wrote:
Ignore this patch, lots of tests fail. I'm working on it.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009
don't need to expand everything out and then
collect terms. Especially when you have coefficients which may be
long and complicated or are already in a nice compact form, you don't
want to expand them out.
~Luke
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because
Attached is an updated patch which adds a docstring that describes the
new optional keyword argument and provides a doctest to demonstrate
the new functionality.
~Luke
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Lukehazelnu...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached is a patch that allows for an optional boolean argument
Attached is a patch that:
1) removes the .expand() call that was being done in matrix_multiply()
2) adds a doctest and improves the docstring
3) provides and alternative implementation that is somewhat clearer,
but about 5% slower.
~Luke
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
Happy to help.
On May 26, 9:48 pm, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
The patch looks good, it's in. Thanks!
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Luke hazelnu...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached is the patch that Fixes issue 626 and allows for solve() to
handle Function and Derivative instances
Has anybody had a chance to review this? If there is anything that
should be done differently, I'm happy to change it up, just let me
know.
Thanks,
~Luke
On May 21, 6:58 pm, Luke hazelnu...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached is the code that allows you to use solve with equations that
have Symbol
Attached is the patch that Fixes issue 626 and allows for solve() to
handle Function and Derivative instances, implements tests for both
cases, and has extensive commenting.
All tests pass on my machine.
Please review and let me know if I can make it better.
Thanks,
~Luke
Attached are the patches for Ondrej's fix.
Note that after this patch:
sqrt(x*y) == sqrt(x)*sqrt(y)
Which is a big problem, lets get it fixed.
Thanks,
~Luke
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy
Issue 626 is fixed by these two patches. Also, solve can now Symbol,
Function, and Derivative types.
I implemented tests and everything passes on my machine.
Thanks,
~Luke
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Attached is the code that allows you to use solve with equations that
have Symbol, Function, or Derivative instances in them.
It passed all tests on my machine. Let me know if there are any problems.
I will be working on a similar patch to do the same thing for diff()
Thanks,
~Luke
Yep. The two patches should take care of it.
On Apr 9, 8:01 pm, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Luke hazelnu...@gmail.com wrote:
So this was my first patch, I hope I did everything
? If not, what do I need to be able close an issue?
Feedback welcome.
Thanks,
~Luke
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy-patches
14 matches
Mail list logo
