Right now only f77. f95 is one of the future options I'm thinkng of.
Feel free to open a ticket, but I won't forget it anyway. It is mainly a
matter of proper line wrapping.
cheers,
Toon
Ondrej Certik wrote:
Thanks! Sorry for the late reply.
Is this using f77, or f95 syntax?
Ondrej
On
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Toon Verstraelen
toon.verstrae...@ugent.be wrote:
Right now only f77. f95 is one of the future options I'm thinkng of. Feel
free to open a ticket, but I won't forget it anyway. It is mainly a matter
of proper line wrapping.
Yes. f77 is fine, it should work in
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Toon Verstraelen
toon.verstrae...@ugent.be wrote:
Right now only f77. f95 is one of the future options I'm thinkng of. Feel
free to open a ticket, but I won't forget it anyway. It is mainly a matter
of proper line wrapping.
Yes. f77 is
Thanks alot!
Vinzent Steinberg wrote:
The patch looks fine to me, however I'm not familiar with fortran. But
no one objected so far, so I pushed it in, thanks.
Vinzent
2010/2/24 Toon Verstraelen toon.verstrae...@gmail.com:
---
doc/src/modules/printing.txt | 96 +++
---
doc/src/modules/printing.txt | 96 +++
sympy/__init__.py |2 +-
sympy/printing/__init__.py |1 +
sympy/printing/fcode.py| 326
sympy/printing/tests/test_fcode.py | 217
