2 MathML Patches

2009-05-24 Thread Thomas Sidoti
>From d11d7e2c1a52af277ab14b95b49c1e320aa87206 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Sidoti Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 16:46:27 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] added tests, EulerGamma, removed pretty --- sympy/printing/mathml.py| 24 ++-- sympy/printing/tests/test_mathml

Re: 2 MathML Patches

2009-05-24 Thread TSidoti
I wasn't sure how to add attachments and stay on the same thread. I changed the comments to comments and removed the prettyxml from the mathml() function but kept it in the print_mathml function. I added two tests which will fail if we don't have the unescape. One way around unescaping is to ke

Re: 2 MathML Patches

2009-05-25 Thread Fabian Pedregosa
Thanks for the patches, thanks for making the appropriate changes. I am quite busy right now with other things, so I'll reply in a couple of days. Looks good overall, but I'd like to investigate a bit because I've got the feeling we can somehow avoid using saxutils.unescape Thomas Sidoti wrote

Re: 2 MathML Patches

2009-05-26 Thread Ondrej Certik
Let's wait for Fabian's review. http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1442 Thanks for the patches! Ondrej On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Fabian Pedregosa wrote: > > Thanks for the patches, thanks for making the appropriate changes. I am > quite busy right now with other things, so

Re: 2 MathML Patches

2009-05-27 Thread Fabian Pedregosa
TSidoti wrote: > I wasn't sure how to add attachments and stay on the same thread. > > I changed the comments to comments and removed the prettyxml from the > mathml() function but kept it in the print_mathml function. > > I added two tests which will fail if we don't have the unescape. One > wa

Re: 2 MathML Patches

2009-05-27 Thread TSidoti
The changes look good. Thanks! -Thomas Sidoti On May 27, 10:33 am, Fabian Pedregosa wrote: > TSidoti wrote: > > I wasn't sure how to add attachments and stay on the same thread. > > > I changed the comments to comments and removed the prettyxml from the > > mathml() function but kept it in the

Re: 2 MathML Patches

2009-05-27 Thread Ondrej Certik
+1 from me too. Ondrej On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:47 AM, TSidoti wrote: > > The changes look good.  Thanks! > > -Thomas Sidoti > > On May 27, 10:33 am, Fabian Pedregosa wrote: >> TSidoti wrote: >> > I wasn't sure how to add attachments and stay on the same thread. >> >> > I changed the comment

Re: 2 MathML Patches

2009-05-27 Thread Fabian Pedregosa
Ondrej Certik wrote: > +1 from me too. Thanks for the review. It's in > > Ondrej > > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:47 AM, TSidoti wrote: >> The changes look good. Thanks! >> >> -Thomas Sidoti >> >> On May 27, 10:33 am, Fabian Pedregosa wrote: >>> TSidoti wrote: I wasn't sure how to add at

Re: 2 MathML Patches

2009-05-28 Thread Fabian Pedregosa
Fabian Pedregosa wrote: > Ondrej Certik wrote: >> +1 from me too. > > Thanks for the review. It's in > >> Ondrej >> >> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:47 AM, TSidoti wrote: >>> The changes look good. Thanks! >>> >>> -Thomas Sidoti >>> >>> On May 27, 10:33 am, Fabian Pedregosa wrote: TSidoti w

Re: 2 MathML Patches

2009-05-31 Thread Ondrej Certik
Where are those patches? I can't find them in the main repository. Am I missing something? Ondrej On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:53 AM, Fabian Pedregosa wrote: > > Fabian Pedregosa wrote: >> Ondrej Certik wrote: >>> +1 from me too. >> >> Thanks for the review. It's in >> >>> Ondrej >>> >>> On Wed, M