I think I could make good use of SymTuples for code generation with
array arguments, and I believe we did reach a conclusion above, so I
rebased the patch to current master and created another patch moving
SymTuple into the core. They are both in the branch
On 1 Mai, 05:24, Ronan Lamy ronan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Le vendredi 30 avril 2010 à 19:59 -0600, Aaron S. Meurer a écrit :
On Apr 30, 2010, at 5:26 PM, Ronan Lamy wrote:
Le vendredi 30 avril 2010 à 16:06 -0700, Ondrej Certik a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Ronan Lamy
On 1 Mai, 15:22, Øyvind Jensen jensen.oyv...@gmail.com wrote:
SymTuple did not fulfill foo.func(*foo.args) == foo. This patch fixes that
by treating the constructor *args as items of the tuple, rather than expecting
exactly one tuple argument.
Added docstring, doctest and test + fixed some
SymTuple did not fulfill foo.func(*foo.args) == foo. This patch fixes that
by storing the wrapped tuple as .args[0] instead of directly as .args
Updated all SymTuple methods, added a test and fixed some whitespace.
---
sympy/physics/secondquant.py| 35
The above patch was my response to Ondrejs comment:
Well,
I am not sure that the change from:
-assert st == SymTuple((1,2,3,4))
to:
+assert st == SymTuple(1, 2, 3, 4)
is a good idea. In fact I think it's a bad idea, as we migrated from
Matrix(1,2, 3, 4) syntax to Matrix([1, 2, 3, 4]).
Le vendredi 30 avril 2010 à 14:23 -0700, Ondrej Certik a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 6:26 AM, jegerjensen jensen.oyv...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, shouldn't this go into sympy.core?
Ondrej
That is probably a good idea. Where should we put the decorator
_tuple_wrapper? Or should
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Ronan Lamy ronan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Le vendredi 30 avril 2010 à 14:23 -0700, Ondrej Certik a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 6:26 AM, jegerjensen jensen.oyv...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, shouldn't this go into sympy.core?
Ondrej
That is probably a
Le vendredi 30 avril 2010 à 16:06 -0700, Ondrej Certik a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Ronan Lamy ronan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Le vendredi 30 avril 2010 à 14:23 -0700, Ondrej Certik a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 6:26 AM, jegerjensen jensen.oyv...@gmail.com
wrote:
Also,
