--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-patches" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy-patches@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sympy-patches+unsubscr...@goog
+else:
+paths = [p for p in glob.glob('sympy/*/tests/test_*.py')
+ if any(a in p for a in args)]
+t.add_paths(paths)
^^ Is this going to work for more nested tests, like
sympy/core/assumptions/tests?
If so, then +1.
Ondrej
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:22 AM, Vi
2009/7/27 Ondrej Certik :
>
> + else:
> + paths = [p for p in glob.glob('sympy/*/tests/test_*.py')
> + if any(a in p for a in args)]
> + t.add_paths(paths)
>
> ^^ Is this going to work for more nested tests, like
> sympy/core/assumptions/tests?
>
> If so, then +1.
2009/7/28 Vinzent Steinberg :
> 2009/7/27 Ondrej Certik :
>>
>> + else:
>> + paths = [p for p in glob.glob('sympy/*/tests/test_*.py')
>> + if any(a in p for a in args)]
>> + t.add_paths(paths)
>>
>> ^^ Is this going to work for more nested tests, like
>> sympy/core/
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 5:17 AM, Vinzent
Steinberg wrote:
> 2009/7/28 Vinzent Steinberg :
>> 2009/7/27 Ondrej Certik :
>>>
>>> + else:
>>> + paths = [p for p in glob.glob('sympy/*/tests/test_*.py')
>>> + if any(a in p for a in args)]
>>> + t.add_paths(paths)
>>>
>>
On 28 Jul., 19:13, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> So in this case, just use the get_paths() method. That way all the
> hacks are concentrated on one place.
>
> Ondrej
Here we go.
Vinzent
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Go
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Vinzent
Steinberg wrote:
> On 28 Jul., 19:13, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> So in this case, just use the get_paths() method. That way all the
>> hacks are concentrated on one place.
>>
>> Ondrej
>
> Here we go.
Now it looks good, +1.
Thanks,
Ondrej
--~--~-~--
It's in, thank you for reviewing.
Vinzent
2009/8/5 Ondrej Certik
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Vinzent
> Steinberg wrote:
> > On 28 Jul., 19:13, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> >> So in this case, just use the get_paths() method. That way all the
> >> hacks are concentrated on one place.
> >>
> >
Everything used to work...now nothing gets run under windows XP:
C:\DOCUME~2\chris\sympy\sympy>\python26\python.exe ..\bin\test core
= test process starts
==
executable: C:\python26\python.exe (2.6.1-final-0)
=== tests
Does bin/test work without argument?
Vinzent
2009/8/11 smichr
>
> Everything used to work...now nothing gets run under windows XP:
>
> C:\DOCUME~2\chris\sympy\sympy>\python26\python.exe ..\bin\test core
> = test process starts
> ==
>
> exe
this was a much more nasty patch than I thought originally (it looked
quite innocent though), but I don't have time now to fix this on
windows --- so if it can't be fixed, we'll have to revert it.
Ondrej
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Vinzent
Steinberg wrote:
> Does bin/test work without argu
On 11 Aug., 18:56, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> this was a much more nasty patch than I thought originally (it looked
> quite innocent though), but I don't have time now to fix this on
> windows --- so if it can't be fixed, we'll have to revert it.
I'm sorry and I really wonder why it fails.
Vinzent
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Vinzent
Steinberg wrote:
>
> On 11 Aug., 18:56, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> this was a much more nasty patch than I thought originally (it looked
>> quite innocent though), but I don't have time now to fix this on
>> windows --- so if it can't be fixed, we'll have to
2009/8/11 Ondrej Certik
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Vinzent
> Steinberg wrote:
> >
> > On 11 Aug., 18:56, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> >> this was a much more nasty patch than I thought originally (it looked
> >> quite innocent though), but I don't have time now to fix this on
> >> windows -
14 matches
Mail list logo
