Comment #10 on issue 1868 by asmeurer: solve(floating point, x) stopped
working
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1868
Any progress with this? Otherwise, I am postponing.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-patches" group.
To po
Comment #11 on issue 1868 by matt...@gmail.com: solve(floating point, x)
stopped working
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1868
The main part of this issue was fixed. In master:
In [1]: EQN1 = -12.0* 12.0*(2*sqrt(3.0) + 9.0) + (78.0 + 24.0*sqrt(3.0)
...: )*x**2 - 3.0*sqrt
Updates:
Labels: -Milestone-Release0.7.0 Milestone-Release0.7.1
Comment #12 on issue 1868 by asmeurer: solve(floating point, x) stopped
working
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1868
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are
Comment #13 on issue 1868 by smi...@gmail.com: solve(floating point, x)
stopped working
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1868
Mateusz, can you confirm that a general solution for a QUARTIC equation is
not possible? So if a solution is requested and there are symbolic
coeffi
Comment #14 on issue 1868 by Vinzent.Steinberg: solve(floating point, x)
stopped working
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1868
AFAIK, there exists a general solution for quartic equations. For
polynomials of a higher degree than 4 it is proofed that no general
solution exis
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -NeedsReview -Milestone-Release0.7.1 -mattpap PassedReview
Comment #15 on issue 1868 by matt...@gmail.com: solve(floating point, x)
stopped working
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1868
The other part (comment #4) still needs fixi
