Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #27 on issue 1919 by asmeurer: unify behavior of var() and symbols()
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1919
This was already pushed in.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-patches" group.
To po
Comment #26 on issue 1919 by asmeurer: unify behavior of var() and symbols()
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1919
This is included in the latest release candidate.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-patches" group.
To post to thi
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview asmeurer
Comment #25 on issue 1919 by asmeurer: unify behavior of var() and symbols()
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1919
See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/409
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group
Updates:
Status: NeedsDecision
Labels: -Milestone-Release0.7.0 -NeedsReview PassedReview
Comment #22 on issue 1919 by asmeurer: unify behavior of var() and symbols()
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1919
The 'x y z' vs. 'x,y,z' is not important for the release, bec
Comment #21 on issue 1919 by asmeurer: unify behavior of var() and symbols()
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1919
Well, obviously I prefer 'x y z'. 'x,y,z' with no spaces just doesn't look
good to me. I don't see why 'x, y, z' should be a no-go.
--
You received this message
Comment #20 on issue 1919 by Vinzent.Steinberg: unify behavior of var() and
symbols()
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1919
Personally, I don't really care.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-patches" group.
To post to this gro
Comment #19 on issue 1919 by matt...@gmail.com: unify behavior of var() and
symbols()
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1919
We will have both, but the question was which one should be preferred.
Currently we have "x,y,z" in library code after my changes and "x y z" in
isymp
Comment #18 on issue 1919 by Vinzent.Steinberg: unify behavior of var() and
symbols()
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1919
So let's just keep both ways of doing things?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-patches" group.
To pos
Comment #17 on issue 1919 by matt...@gmail.com: unify behavior of var() and
symbols()
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1919
When talking about DSLs in SymPy, we shouldn't take Python code quality
standards into account. My self I like symbols("x,y,z") and obviously
symbols(
Comment #16 on issue 1919 by smi...@gmail.com: unify behavior of var() and
symbols()
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1919
I don't care either way. Within the string, my PEP-8 glasses become
transparent.
/c
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo
Comment #15 on issue 1919 by Vinzent.Steinberg: unify behavior of var() and
symbols()
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1919
I don't like symbols('x, y, z') because it is needlessly verbose. I know
that Mateusz prefers symbols('x,y,z') over symbols('x y z'), so I guess we
ne
Comment #14 on issue 1919 by asmeurer: unify behavior of var() and symbols()
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1919
polys12 has been merged, but before we close this, we should change all
symbols('x,y,z') with symbols('x y z') or symbols('x, y, z') (because the
former looks awf
12 matches
Mail list logo
