Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #6 on issue 1944 by smi...@gmail.com: limit() returns incorrect
answer for limit(exp(-x/a), x, oo)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1944
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Comment #4 on issue 1944 by smi...@gmail.com: limit() returns incorrect
answer for limit(exp(-x/a), x, oo)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1944
In the current pull/61 this gives:
h[1] limit(exp(-x/a),x,oo)
nan
h[2] var('a', positive=True)
a
h[3]
Comment #5 on issue 1944 by smi...@gmail.com: limit() returns incorrect
answer for limit(exp(-x/a), x, oo)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1944
With [ https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/61] this is resolved as noted
above.
--
You received this message because you are
Updates:
Labels: smichr
Comment #3 on issue 1944 by asmeurer: limit() returns incorrect answer for
limit(exp(-x/a), x, oo)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1944
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #1 on issue 1944 by smi...@gmail.com: limit() returns incorrect
answer for limit(exp(-x/a), x, oo)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1944
commit 1944 in [ https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/61 ] this is now the
behavior:
h[2]
