Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #19 on issue 841 by ness...@gmail.com:
integrate(exp(-x**2)*exp(I*k*x), (x, -oo, oo)) doesn't calculate the
integral
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=841
gsoc-3 was merged.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Updates:
Blockedon: 2712
Comment #18 on issue 841 by asmeu...@gmail.com:
integrate(exp(-x**2)*exp(I*k*x), (x, -oo, oo)) doesn't calculate the
integral
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=841
There is a test for this in gsoc-3.
--
You received this message because you ar
Comment #17 on issue 841 by asmeurer: integrate(exp(-x**2)*exp(I*k*x), (x,
-oo, oo)) doesn't calculate the integral
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=841
Issue 1796 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"s
Comment #16 on issue 841 by asmeurer: integrate(exp(-x**2)*exp(I*k*x), (x,
-oo, oo)) doesn't calculate the integral
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=841
By the way, are you adding tests for these integrals in your branch?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
Comment #15 on issue 841 by asmeurer: integrate(exp(-x**2)*exp(I*k*x), (x,
-oo, oo)) doesn't calculate the integral
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=841
Yes, now that we have the Meijer G method, there is little sense in writing
table lookup heuristics for this.
Regarding "
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #14 on issue 841 by ness...@googlemail.com:
integrate(exp(-x**2)*exp(I*k*x), (x, -oo, oo)) doesn't calculate the
integral
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=841
The definite integral works in gsoc-3
(https://github.com/sympy/sympy/
Updates:
Labels: -Milestone-Release0.7.0
Comment #13 on issue 841 by asmeurer: integrate(exp(-x**2)*exp(I*k*x), (x,
-oo, oo)) doesn't calculate the integral
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=841
Another (and in my opinion, better, until we can get the solution mentioned
