ches?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
From 2bed88ba04c4aa00183222cb63c3f52507249352 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ondrej Certik
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:29:43 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] trigsimp() two hacks removed
The trigsimp(1/cos(x)**2 -1) should return tan(x)**2, but it
Ondrej Certik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sending a trivial patch to remove hacks from trigsimp.
>
removing hacks is always good news, but I do not agree that
sin(x)**2/cos(x)**2 is a valid answer.
By definition, trigsimp will try to return the simplest possible
expression, and although 'the simplest p
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Fabian Seoane wrote:
>
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> sending a trivial patch to remove hacks from trigsimp.
>>
>
> removing hacks is always good news, but I do not agree that
> sin(x)**2/cos(x)**2 is a valid answer.
> By definition, trigsimp will try to retu
Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Fabian Seoane wrote:
>
>> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> sending a trivial patch to remove hacks from trigsimp.
>>>
>>>
>> removing hacks is always good news, but I do not agree that
>> sin(x)**2/cos(x)**2 is a valid
~~--~--~---
From bddf677be04b62d450229a622c8e8bd73d92e38d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ondrej Certik
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:13:59 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] trigsimp() two hacks removed and done right
Previously trigsimp() failed to simplify sin(x)/cos(x) to tan(x) and similar
things and
nice patch. +1
Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Fabian Seoane wrote:
>> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> sending a trivial patch to remove hacks from trigsimp.
>>>
>> removing hacks is always good news, but I do not agree that
>> sin(x)**2/cos(x)**2 is a valid answer.
