Re: comparison with current sync and when new FxA/sync lands into (mzsync: message 2 of 20) stable firefox

On Feb 9, 2014, at 11:21 AM, Eric Le Lay wrote: > > Thank you for your answer. > > So > https://wiki.mozilla.org/Identity/AttachedServices/Architecture#Data_Security > is outdated, then. I have updated this page to reflect that it's not the pages for sync and included a pointer to the correc

Re: comparison with current sync and when new FxA/sync lands into (mzsync: message 2 of 20) stable firefox

> So > https://wiki.mozilla.org/Identity/AttachedServices/Architecture#Data_Security > is outdated, then. Yes. > I understand the Mozilla teams are very busy just now, but is there > authoritative documentation ? Wiki:https://wiki.mozilla.org/User_Services/Sync/Relaunch Storage: http://docs

Re: comparison with current sync and when new FxA/sync lands into (mzsync: message 2 of 20) stable firefox

Le Sat, 8 Feb 2014 14:34:36 -0800, "Richard Newman - rnew...@mozilla.com" a écrit : > > As far as I understand, the new sync weakens users' privacy but > > gives the convenience of recovering bookmarks, history, preferences > > when having forgotten the password and/or lost the recovery key. Is >

Re: Desktop 29 bug list clean-up

On 8/02/2014 9:58 AM, Richard Newman wrote: >> - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=927527 support for >> "over-quota" notification > > I don't believe we currently track quotas, so this seems non-urgent, but > rfkelly and telliott might have a different (and more valid) opinion. Corre