Re: Rebootable Sync Nodes

2018-05-31 Thread Ryan Kelly
On 1 June 2018 at 01:22, Richard Newman wrote: > There's another option here that hasn't been mentioned: switch to storing > tabs on disk. It's possible that the considerations that caused us to not > persist them are no longer worth the difference in behavior. > > Most users will have relatively

Re: Rebootable Sync Nodes

2018-05-31 Thread Craig Arno
I like this one.  When I'm doing research and switch to a new machine (usually going home for the night, in the lab, notebook, tablet, ...) I may have a thought and want to access part of what I was doing during the day.  Sometimes I can have ~30 -100 tabs open. On 5/31/2018 8:22 AM, Richard Newm

Re: Rebootable Sync Nodes

2018-05-31 Thread Richard Newman
There's another option here that hasn't been mentioned: switch to storing tabs on disk. It's possible that the considerations that caused us to not persist them are no longer worth the difference in behavior. Most users will have relatively small tabs records. We already persist other churny data,