Patrick Ohly wrote:
> I consider SyncEvolution stable as it is and don't have plans to add
> features. I'll keep maintaining it as long as people use it - which I
> assume people still do (hard to tell with open source, in particular
> when users don't need to download it from syncevolution.org be
deloptes writes:
> Interesting to know what is the status of syncevolution and what Patrick is
> planning to do with it in the future.
I consider SyncEvolution stable as it is and don't have plans to add
features. I'll keep maintaining it as long as people use it - which I
assume people still do
