On 5/30/2017 9:57 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
I setup an archive dir under the updates dir that is excluded from
rsync so we would still keep the files on the server but they would
drop off of the rsync out to the mirrors.
I haven't moved any files yet.
What I'd suggest is:
- See my "soon to be s
I setup an archive dir under the updates dir that is excluded from rsync
so we would still keep the files on the server but they would drop off
of the rsync out to the mirrors.
I haven't moved any files yet.
Dave
On 05/30/2017 08:56 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 5/30/2017 9:47 AM, Dave Jone
On 5/30/2017 9:47 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
Ok. That's fine.
To be clear, if we can confirm better backup situation, the archive dir
idea sounds great!
Working through your other emails. I was camping with BSA for Memorial
Day weekend.
Regards,
KAM
On 05/30/2017 08:23 AM, Kevin A. McGrail w
Ok. That's fine.
On 05/30/2017 08:23 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Hi Dave,
Those files are official project release artifacts so yes, we need to
keep them. And the update mirrors have served as our backups of those
files.
I'd prefer it stay as is.
Regards,
KAM
On 5/28/2017 10:59 AM, Dave
Hi Dave,
Those files are official project release artifacts so yes, we need to
keep them. And the update mirrors have served as our backups of those
files.
I'd prefer it stay as is.
Regards,
KAM
On 5/28/2017 10:59 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
Kevin,
Do we need to keep rule update files back to
Kevin,
Do we need to keep rule update files back to 2007? It seems like having
only the past year or even few months is all that we need. Technically,
the only ones that need to be in the updates directory are ones that are
pointed to by the [reverse version].updates.spamassassin.org TXT DNS
