[Syslog] syslog-protocol draft

2005-12-14 Thread Balazs Scheidler
Hi, I was just wondering if the next syslog-protocol draft is in the works, or should I just review the current version? -- Bazsi ___ Syslog mailing list Syslog@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog

[Syslog] RE: syslog-protocol draft

2005-12-14 Thread Rainer Gerhards
Hi Bazsi, many thanks for your mail. I am working on a new draft. But as it is xmas time, it's quite busy, so other things also come into my way. My goal is to finish a new version before xmas holiday, but I can not totally commit on that. I'd appreciate if you could review it when it comes out.

[Syslog] RE: syslog-protocol draft

2005-12-14 Thread Balazs Scheidler
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 13:56 +0100, Rainer Gerhards wrote: Hi Bazsi, many thanks for your mail. I am working on a new draft. But as it is xmas time, it's quite busy, so other things also come into my way. My goal is to finish a new version before xmas holiday, but I can not totally commit on

[Syslog] RE: syslog-protocol draft

2005-12-14 Thread Rainer Gerhards
Bazsi, many thanks for your mail. I am working on a new draft. But as it is xmas time, it's quite busy, so other things also come into my way. My goal is to finish a new version before xmas holiday, but I can not totally commit on that. I'd appreciate if you could review it when it

Re: [Syslog] RE: syslog-protocol draft

2005-12-14 Thread Darren Reed
:-) Just a comment on the list: it is my observation that sometimes discussion peeks and at other times there is virtually none. For the time being, I think everything that needed to be said is said and so folks are waiting if I manage to come up with the right text to cover the consensus [I

RE: [Syslog] RE: syslog-protocol draft

2005-12-14 Thread Rainer Gerhards
Darren, I have seen nobody backing your position, so I think it was consensus to ignore these comments. Rainer -Original Message- From: Darren Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 2:30 PM To: Rainer Gerhards Cc: Balazs Scheidler; [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Syslog] RE: syslog-protocol draft

2005-12-14 Thread Darren Reed
Darren, I have seen nobody backing your position, so I think it was consensus to ignore these comments. And nobody decrying them either. So are you saying, you need me too's on comments before you'll make any replies to issues people bring up ? It shouldn't take everyone to speak out about

RE: [Syslog] RE: syslog-protocol draft

2005-12-14 Thread Rainer Gerhards
Darren, an I would like to see this too is a good indication that a controversal feature is required. I have honestly posted what I think so that all others can jump in. For the rest, see the archive ;) Rainer -Original Message- From: Darren Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

[Syslog] #7 field order

2005-12-14 Thread David B Harrington
Hi, Better yet, **I'll** change the subject to #7 field order. Thanks, dbh -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Reed Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 3:43 PM To: Darren Reed Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Syslog] RE: