]
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 8:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Syslog] MSG encoding and content (#3, #4, #5) (fwd)
Hi Folks,
I asked Patrik Faltstrom to review this proposal. He has some comments
below. Let's don't get hung up in his details - he has looked this over
without any knowledge of our
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Lonvick
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 8:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Syslog] MSG encoding and content (#3, #4, #5) (fwd)
Hi Folks,
I asked Patrik Faltstrom to review this proposal. He has
some comments
below
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Lonvick
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 8:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Syslog] MSG encoding and content (#3, #4, #5) (fwd)
Hi Folks,
I asked Patrik Faltstrom to review this proposal. He has
some
Hi WG,
the topic of MSG encoding as well as its content (e.g. NUL and LF
characters) has not yet been solved. The past days, I've talked to a lot
of my friends not on this list and I have also looked at various ways to
solve the issue. Be prepared, this is another long mail, but I think it
is
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 15:30 +0100, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
Hi WG,
the topic of MSG encoding as well as its content (e.g. NUL and LF
characters) has not yet been solved. The past days, I've talked to a lot
of my friends not on this list and I have also looked at various ways to
solve the
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Syslog] MSG encoding and content (#3, #4, #5) (fwd)
Let's first quickly review what has been discussed on list:
- current implementations sometimes use LF as a record delimiter
Ok
- some implementations use LF inside the MSG part
Ok
- some implementations
