Re: [systemd-devel] 'tasks' as first-order objects?

2010-08-14 Thread Graham Cantin
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Fri, 13.08.10 12:16, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) said: > > > Yes, I share the same belief, which is one of the reasons I'd be happy > > > to rename this. > > > > > >

Re: [systemd-devel] 'tasks' as first-order objects?

2010-08-14 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 14.08.10 17:59, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote: > > On Fri, 13.08.10 12:16, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > > Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) said: > > > Yes, I share the same belief, which is one of the reasons I'd be happy > > > to r

Re: [systemd-devel] 'tasks' as first-order objects?

2010-08-14 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 13.08.10 12:16, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote: > > Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) said: > > Yes, I share the same belief, which is one of the reasons I'd be happy > > to rename this. > > > > So, Kay and I came up with these two ideas: > > > > KeepAfterExit=