Properly order these units so that the a partition is not mount
before the fsck is done in a Debian system.
---
Makefile.am |6 +-
units/debian/fsck.target |2 ++
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index e1fe9e6..c1c243
> The abstract socket namespace support was enabled when compiling dbus.
It's simply a bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29895
Best regards, Wulf
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
systemd-devel mai
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2010/9/10 Santi Béjar :
>> Hi *,
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Jens Persson wrote:
>>> Try to put your check services in sysinit.target.wants and add
>>> After=sysinit.target to local-fs.target.
>>
>> I've tried something like this.
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Jens Persson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Santi Béjar wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Jens Persson wrote:
>> > Ok, then try to add After=fsck.target to sysinit.target.
>> >
>>
>> Ok, this works. But while I think this is a good change,
2010/9/10 Santi Béjar :
> Hi *,
>
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Jens Persson wrote:
>> Try to put your check services in sysinit.target.wants and add
>> After=sysinit.target to local-fs.target.
>
> I've tried something like this. But first let me correct my report,
> the patch breaking my boot
Hi !
The abstract socket namespace support was enabled when compiling dbus. I
will try to look up the places where systemd tries to create a dbus server
and to establish a dbus connection.
Best !
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freed
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Santi Béjar wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Jens Persson wrote:
> > Ok, then try to add After=fsck.target to sysinit.target.
> >
>
> Ok, this works. But while I think this is a good change, I wonder why
> a direct dependency/sorting between home.target
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:14:13AM +0300, Cristian Axenie wrote:
> Hi, again !
> I've managed to apply the patches and fixed all conflicts, modified DBus and
> Udev and the problem persists regarding the abstract socket namespace.
> Mainly I think there is a DBus problem.
> Here's my boot output :
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Jens Persson wrote:
> Ok, then try to add After=fsck.target to sysinit.target.
>
Ok, this works. But while I think this is a good change, I wonder why
a direct dependency/sorting between home.target, fsck.target and
checkfs.service is not enough.
I'll do more tes
Hi, again !
I've managed to apply the patches and fixed all conflicts, modified DBus and
Udev and the problem persists regarding the abstract socket namespace.
Mainly I think there is a DBus problem.
Here's my boot output :
[ 18.75] Freeing init memory: 152K
[ 19.40] systemd[1]: system
10 matches
Mail list logo