W dniu 29 kwietnia 2011 04:09 użytkownik Jasper Boot
napisał:
> Hi,
> 2011/4/29 Michał Piotrowski
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> By the way, maybe it would be good to think about the meaning of /srv
>> existance? For seven years FHS requires that this directory exists
>> http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:37:26AM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> By the way, maybe it would be good to think about the meaning of /srv
> existance? For seven years FHS requires that this directory exists
> http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#PURPOSE16A
> but "The methodology used to na
Hi,
2011/4/29 Michał Piotrowski
> Hi,
>
> By the way, maybe it would be good to think about the meaning of /srv
> existance? For seven years FHS requires that this directory exists
> http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#PURPOSE16A
> but "The methodology used to name subdirectories of /sr
Hi,
I think it's a very good decision - I never understood why selinux dir
is directly under /.
By the way, maybe it would be good to think about the meaning of /srv
existance? For seven years FHS requires that this directory exists
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#PURPOSE16A
but "The
