Re: [systemd-devel] [bug?] screen not working correctly under systemd

2011-05-18 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2011/5/19 microcai : > When you ssh to an systemd machine, and start a screen session, detach > and logout. > > Then this screen session will be wipe out by systemd, so , when you > login back, there will be no screen session out there. Works fine here - I use F15. systemd v26 > > > Is this

[systemd-devel] [bug?] screen not working correctly under systemd

2011-05-18 Thread microcai
When you ssh to an systemd machine, and start a screen session, detach and logout. Then this screen session will be wipe out by systemd, so , when you login back, there will be no screen session out there. Is this a bug? of screen or systemd? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signat

Re: [systemd-devel] udev took too long to start

2011-05-18 Thread microcai
于 2011年05月19日 13:24, Canek Peláez Valdés 写道: > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:58 PM, microcai wrote: >> 于 2011年05月18日 21:59, Canek Peláez Valdés 写道: >>> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:14 AM, microcai >>> wrote: >>> [...] I'm not saying to rip-out udev, but speed up the udev. >>> >>> It's probably no

Re: [systemd-devel] udev took too long to start

2011-05-18 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:58 PM, microcai wrote: > 于 2011年05月18日 21:59, Canek Peláez Valdés 写道: >> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:14 AM, microcai wrote: >> [...] >>> I'm not saying to rip-out udev, but speed up the udev. >> >> It's probably not udev fault, but a udev rule in Gentoo (I suppose you >>

Re: [systemd-devel] udev took too long to start

2011-05-18 Thread microcai
于 2011年05月18日 21:59, Canek Peláez Valdés 写道: > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:14 AM, microcai wrote: > [...] >> I'm not saying to rip-out udev, but speed up the udev. > > It's probably not udev fault, but a udev rule in Gentoo (I suppose you > use Gentoo, you mentioned an overlay) that calls an OpenRC

Re: [systemd-devel] RFC , dnsmasq patch

2011-05-18 Thread microcai
于 2011年05月19日 01:48, Lennart Poettering 写道: > On Thu, 19.05.11 01:43, microcai (micro...@fedoraproject.org) wrote: > >> Heya, >> >> Here is the patch for dnsmasq to support systemd socket activation. Just >> put it here for you guys to review before submitting to upstream. >> >> Is it good? Or jus

Re: [systemd-devel] RFC , dnsmasq patch

2011-05-18 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 19.05.11 01:43, microcai (micro...@fedoraproject.org) wrote: > Heya, > > Here is the patch for dnsmasq to support systemd socket activation. Just > put it here for you guys to review before submitting to upstream. > > Is it good? Or just ugly ? Looks pretty much correct. Of course, I ha

[systemd-devel] RFC , dnsmasq patch

2011-05-18 Thread microcai
Heya, Here is the patch for dnsmasq to support systemd socket activation. Just put it here for you guys to review before submitting to upstream. Is it good? Or just ugly ? For gentoo users, feel free to add my overlay here https://github.com/microcai/myoverlay/raw/master/repo.xml From: microc

Re: [systemd-devel] udev took too long to start

2011-05-18 Thread Kay Sievers
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 15:46, Chen Jie wrote: > 2011/5/18 Kay Sievers : >> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 14:18, Chen Jie wrote: >>> 2011/5/18 Kay Sievers : >> udev.service does usually takes no time. It's the settle that may block for a longer time. In your chart it seems like a side-effect,

Re: [systemd-devel] udev took too long to start

2011-05-18 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:14 AM, microcai wrote: [...] > I'm not saying to rip-out udev, but speed up the udev. It's probably not udev fault, but a udev rule in Gentoo (I suppose you use Gentoo, you mentioned an overlay) that calls an OpenRC script. That slows down the whole boot for whole minute

Re: [systemd-devel] udev took too long to start

2011-05-18 Thread Kay Sievers
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 14:18, Chen Jie wrote: > 2011/5/18 Kay Sievers : >> udev.service does usually takes no time. It's the settle that may >> block for a longer time. In your chart it seems like a side-effect, >> and the root-fsck seems suspicious. any idea what could take so long >> here? Car

Re: [systemd-devel] udev took too long to start

2011-05-18 Thread Kay Sievers
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:37, microcai wrote: > udev and systemd are from systemd overlay. > > udev is udev-168-r1 > systemd is systemd-26 > > All compiled with CFLAGS="-Os -march=native" > > systemd-analyze plot have problem generationg SVG file, so I change the > code to make a PDF. > > > Will

Re: [systemd-devel] udev took too long to start

2011-05-18 Thread microcai
于 2011年05月18日 17:54, fykc...@gmail.com 写道: > Hi, > > udev.service doesn't include 'settle' action, it is simplely because > udev starting/adding spends some time. > > Many services depends on udev directly or indirectly, so the boot > process is serialized when udev starting. > > Currently, syst

Re: [systemd-devel] udev took too long to start

2011-05-18 Thread fykc...@gmail.com
Hi, udev.service doesn't include 'settle' action, it is simplely because udev starting/adding spends some time. Many services depends on udev directly or indirectly, so the boot process is serialized when udev starting. Currently, systemd is deeply integrated with udev, it was not easy to "First

[systemd-devel] udev took too long to start

2011-05-18 Thread microcai
OK, here is my problem: udev and systemd are from systemd overlay. udev is udev-168-r1 systemd is systemd-26 All compiled with CFLAGS="-Os -march=native" systemd-analyze plot have problem generationg SVG file, so I change the code to make a PDF. Will anyone please lookat my boot analyze PDF?