Re: [systemd-devel] Error: inappropriate ioctl stty standard input

2011-06-28 Thread Stef Bon
2011/6/27 Lennart Poettering : > On Sat, 25.06.11 21:57, Stef Bon (stef...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've been able to make my shiny new LFS system boot using systemd, but >> still with errors. When the tty's are activated, >> Iget the message: >> >>  stty: standard input: Inappropriate ioct

[systemd-devel] [HEADSUP] We no longer spawn 6 gettys by default

2011-06-28 Thread Lennart Poettering
Heya, a small heads-up on one thing that I just added to git: we no longer start 5 gettys on vt2-vt6 by default. Instead in multi-user mode we start only one getty on tty1 resp. in graphical mode one dm on tty1. Effectively this changes very little though: we now spawn additional gettys as they ar

Re: [systemd-devel] autofs and hugetlbfs on ARM

2011-06-28 Thread Bjoern Buerger
* Kay Sievers (kay.siev...@vrfy.org) [110628 12:45]: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 09:43, Michael Olbrich > wrote: > > At first /dev/hugepages exists. If I run "ls /dev/hugepages", > > "mount[494]: mount: unknown filesystem type 'hugetlbfs'" is logged and > > ls says "ls: /dev/hugepages: No such devi

Re: [systemd-devel] RFC: creating a set of systemd RPM macros across distributions ?

2011-06-28 Thread Kay Sievers
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:32, Miklos Vajna wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 06:23:23PM +0200, Lennart Poettering > wrote: >> On Mon, 27.06.11 17:37, Ludwig Nussel (ludwig.nus...@suse.de) wrote: >> >> > Frederic Crozat wrote: >> > > [...] >> > > %service_add_enabled() >> > > if [ "$1" -eq 1 ] ;

Re: [systemd-devel] RFC: creating a set of systemd RPM macros across distributions ?

2011-06-28 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 06:23:23PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 27.06.11 17:37, Ludwig Nussel (ludwig.nus...@suse.de) wrote: > > > Frederic Crozat wrote: > > > [...] > > > %service_add_enabled() > > > if [ "$1" -eq 1 ] ; then > > > # Initial installation > > > /bin/systemctl enabl

Re: [systemd-devel] autofs and hugetlbfs on ARM

2011-06-28 Thread Kay Sievers
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 09:43, Michael Olbrich wrote: > more stuff from the embedded front. On ARM hugetlbfs is not supported. The > result is rather confusing for the user: > At first /dev/hugepages exists. If I run "ls /dev/hugepages", > "mount[494]: mount: unknown filesystem type 'hugetlbfs'" i

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd and LSB Required/Should-Stop

2011-06-28 Thread Ville Skyttä
On 06/27/2011 04:18 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 24.06.11 14:04, Ville Skyttä (ville.sky...@iki.fi) wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Am I right that systemd does currently have no support for the LSB >> Required-Stop and Should-Stop keywords? If yes, are there plans to >> support them in the f

[systemd-devel] autofs and hugetlbfs on ARM

2011-06-28 Thread Michael Olbrich
Hi, more stuff from the embedded front. On ARM hugetlbfs is not supported. The result is rather confusing for the user: At first /dev/hugepages exists. If I run "ls /dev/hugepages", "mount[494]: mount: unknown filesystem type 'hugetlbfs'" is logged and ls says "ls: /dev/hugepages: No such device".

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] umount: ignore missing /proc/swaps

2011-06-28 Thread Michael Olbrich
/proc/swaps does not exist when swap is disabled in the kernel. Just report an empty list of mountpoints to unmount in this case. --- Hi, Missed this one, when I made the last patch. This should take care of any bogus swap error messages during shutdown. Regards, Michael Olbrich src/umount.c |