2011/6/28 Stef Bon :
> 2011/6/27 Lennart Poettering :
>> On Sat, 25.06.11 21:57, Stef Bon (stef...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've been able to make my shiny new LFS system boot using systemd, but
>>> still with errors. When the tty's are activated,
>>> Iget the message:
>>>
>>> stty: st
Hi,
I think it's ok to only activate the getty programs on demand. Maybe
use only mingetty??
Who works on the serial line these days? mingetty is faster
I would like to add the following:
I had some trouble with logmessages on my screen while the login is
there already.
This has probably som
Move the get_user_creds from execute.c to utils.c for later usage in
nspawn.c.
---
src/execute.c | 46 --
src/util.c| 47 +++
src/util.h|2 ++
3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
Add -u/--user option, which changes the effective and real user and
group id to the new value. The user must exists in the chroot, otherwise
it will fail. Both username and user id are accepted. The user home is
created as well.
It also setup HOME, USER, LOGNAME and SHELL variables .
---
man/syst
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:15:02AM +0200, Stef Bon wrote:
> I think it's ok to only activate the getty programs on demand. Maybe
> use only mingetty?? Who works on the serial line these days?
The embedded folks.
rsc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
In
Op 29 jun 2011, om 14:37 heeft Robert Schwebel het volgende geschreven:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:15:02AM +0200, Stef Bon wrote:
>> I think it's ok to only activate the getty programs on demand. Maybe
>> use only mingetty?? Who works on the serial line these days?
>
> The embedded folks.
Ind
On 29/06/11 13:45, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 29 jun 2011, om 14:37 heeft Robert Schwebel het volgende geschreven:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:15:02AM +0200, Stef Bon wrote:
I think it's ok to only activate the getty programs on demand. Maybe
use only mingetty?? Who works on the serial line these day
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 14:54, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> On 29/06/11 13:45, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>
>> Op 29 jun 2011, om 14:37 heeft Robert Schwebel het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:15:02AM +0200, Stef Bon wrote:
I think it's ok to only activate the getty progra
On Wed, 29.06.11 11:15, Stef Bon (stef...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I think it's ok to only activate the getty programs on demand. Maybe
> use only mingetty??
We gently try to push everybody to standardize on util-linux'
agetty. There is no point in maintaining multiple mostly equivalent
ge
On Tue, 28.06.11 20:43, Stef Bon (stef...@gmail.com) wrote:
> 2011/6/27 Lennart Poettering :
> > On Sat, 25.06.11 21:57, Stef Bon (stef...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've been able to make my shiny new LFS system boot using systemd, but
> >> still with errors. When the tty's are acti
Ok, I did not expect this. Ok, stupid idea, forget it.
But what about the "log console", redirecting log to one of the
virtual consoles, reachable via alt-fx?
Stef
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedeskt
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:37 AM, Robert Schwebel
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:15:02AM +0200, Stef Bon wrote:
>> I think it's ok to only activate the getty programs on demand. Maybe
>> use only mingetty?? Who works on the serial line these days?
>
> The embedded folks.
*raises hands*
And I
12 matches
Mail list logo
