Re: [systemd-devel] Seeking Advice on debugging failure to reboot

2011-10-12 Thread Barry Scott
On Wednesday 12 October 2011 16:42:38 Michal Schmidt wrote: > On 10/12/2011 04:54 PM, Barry Scott wrote: > > What dependency is supposed to cause the swapoff to be after the production > > processes are stopped? > > The units' ordering should be something like this: > > *.swap Before swap.target

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/4] systemd and watchdog

2011-10-12 Thread Kay Sievers
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 15:12, Michael Olbrich wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 06:59:14PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote: >> What do you think? > > No comments at all? I realize, that this is not a topic that is relevant > for most people. But maybe I could get some feedback if anything like this >

Re: [systemd-devel] [Netatalk-admins] Restart=always and "ExecStartPre" (netatalk)

2011-10-12 Thread Frank Lahm
2011/10/12 Reindl Harald : > Am 12.10.2011 15:35, schrieb HAT: > From: Reindl Harald , 05 Oct 2011 12:32:00 +0200 > /lib/systemd/system/netatalk-afpd.service /lib/systemd/system/netatalk-cnid.service /lib/systemd/system/netatalk-atalk.service > >> there are a lot of manuals but the m

Re: [systemd-devel] Seeking Advice on debugging failure to reboot

2011-10-12 Thread Michal Schmidt
On 10/12/2011 04:54 PM, Barry Scott wrote: What dependency is supposed to cause the swapoff to be after the production processes are stopped? The units' ordering should be something like this: *.swap Before swap.target Before sysinit.target Before basic.target Before production.service This o

Re: [systemd-devel] Seeking Advice on debugging failure to reboot

2011-10-12 Thread Barry Scott
On Wednesday 12 October 2011 15:27:10 Michal Schmidt wrote: > On 10/12/2011 03:46 PM, Barry Scott wrote: > > Thanks to Michal's observation that swapoff failed we have now found the > > root cause. > > > > swapoff is called while all our production processes are still running. > > > > We would have

Re: [systemd-devel] [Netatalk-admins] Restart=always and "ExecStartPre" (netatalk)

2011-10-12 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 12.10.2011 15:57, schrieb Frank Lahm: > 2011/10/12 Reindl Harald : >> Am 12.10.2011 15:35, schrieb HAT: >> From: Reindl Harald , 05 Oct 2011 12:32:00 +0200 >> > /lib/systemd/system/netatalk-afpd.service > /lib/systemd/system/netatalk-cnid.service > /lib/systemd/system/netatalk-atal

Re: [systemd-devel] Seeking Advice on debugging failure to reboot

2011-10-12 Thread Michal Schmidt
On 10/12/2011 03:46 PM, Barry Scott wrote: Thanks to Michal's observation that swapoff failed we have now found the root cause. swapoff is called while all our production processes are still running. We would have expected systemd to turn off swap after stopping most if not all processes and th

Re: [systemd-devel] Seeking Advice on debugging failure to reboot

2011-10-12 Thread Barry Scott
Thanks to Michal's observation that swapoff failed we have now found the root cause. swapoff is called while all our production processes are still running. We would have expected systemd to turn off swap after stopping most if not all processes and thus freeing up as much memory as possible. sw

Re: [systemd-devel] [Netatalk-admins] Restart=always and "ExecStartPre" (netatalk)

2011-10-12 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 12.10.2011 15:35, schrieb HAT: hi, From: Reindl Harald , 05 Oct 2011 12:32:00 +0200 >>> /lib/systemd/system/netatalk-afpd.service >>> /lib/systemd/system/netatalk-cnid.service >>> /lib/systemd/system/netatalk-atalk.service > there are a lot of manuals but the most relevant in my opinion ar

Re: [systemd-devel] [Netatalk-admins] Restart=always and "ExecStartPre" (netatalk)

2011-10-12 Thread HAT
hi, From: Reindl Harald , 05 Oct 2011 12:32:00 +0200 >>> /lib/systemd/system/netatalk-afpd.service >>> /lib/systemd/system/netatalk-cnid.service >>> /lib/systemd/system/netatalk-atalk.service > there are a lot of manuals but the most relevant in my opinion are > http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/4] systemd and watchdog

2011-10-12 Thread Michael Olbrich
Hi, On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 06:59:14PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote: > What do you think? No comments at all? I realize, that this is not a topic that is relevant for most people. But maybe I could get some feedback if anything like this has a chance to be merged at all, or if I should work on a