Re: [systemd-devel] After httpd.service

2011/11/6 Michael D. Berger : > In my F15_64, in myUpperDaemon.service, I need the > dependency specified by: > > After httpd.service > > but there is no httpd.service .  After looking at > /etc/init.d/httpd, I see no obvious reason why > I shouldn't write a httpd.service .  But then, why is > it n

[systemd-devel] After httpd.service

In my F15_64, in myUpperDaemon.service, I need the dependency specified by: After httpd.service but there is no httpd.service . After looking at /etc/init.d/httpd, I see no obvious reason why I shouldn't write a httpd.service . But then, why is it not provided? Would there be some problem I do

[systemd-devel] contingent After

Thanks to the help provided by members of the list, myDaemon is now functioning correctly under systemd. Now for myUpperDaemon: IF myDaemon is enabled; then myUpperDaemon must start after myDaemon ELSE myUpperDaemon must start anyway ENDIF Actually myUpperDaemon depends on numerous daemons

[systemd-devel] crypttab tmp devices not fully initalized

Hi all, I am fairly certain that the crypttab tmp devices are not being fully initialized. The man page for crypttab states: tmpThe encrypted block device will be prepared for using it as tmp partition: it will be formatted using mke2fs and its root directory will be set t

Re: [systemd-devel] removing daemon(0,0)

'Twas brillig, and Michael D. Berger at 05/11/11 00:19 did gyre and gimble: > >> -Original Message- >> From: Michal Schmidt [mailto:mschm...@redhat.com] >> Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 17:45 >> To: Michael D. Berger >> Cc: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org >> Subject: Re: [systemd-de