On Wed, 11.01.12 22:01, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
> Is your machine 32bit?
>
> /me goes and fixes that.
Here's the fix:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/patch/?id=fdcad0c25579a60061b1fda956686e878a80faef
What's interesting btw is though the first column of /
On Wed, 11.01.12 12:38, Michael Meeks (michael.me...@suse.com) wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Trying to chase down my sudden keyring / tmpfile socket death
> syndrome ;-) I poked at the tmpfile cleanup code.
>
> With this debug patch:
> line 'f2f8b940: 0002 0001 0001 01
> 42
On Wednesday 2012-01-11 16:39, Kay Sievers wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 16:04, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>
>> Therefore you can detect which programs where started inside the rootfs
>> vfsmount. That information can then influence killing decisions as
>> needed.
>>
>> Now, Kay Sievers claims (on I
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 16:04, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> Therefore you can detect which programs where started inside the rootfs
> vfsmount. That information can then influence killing decisions as
> needed.
>
> Now, Kay Sievers claims (on IRC) pivot_root is "10 years ago stuff" and
> points to uti
On Wednesday 2012-01-11 16:13, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>
>> Of course, if you conceal the rootfs-type vfsmount, there is no way that
>> the proc trick is going to work -- which is why I proposed using
>> pivot_root instead of {MS_MOVE + chroot} and *keeping* the rootfs
>> vfsmount around, in
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> rsyslog is actually too smart for us here, and will take the socket, but
> also open /dev/log in addition to that, which we want to avoid.
>
> I think rsyslog is actually doing the right thing here, though. It's the
> smart and the right
On Wed, 11.01.12 16:04, Jan Engelhardt (jeng...@medozas.de) wrote:
> Now, Kay Sievers claims (on IRC) pivot_root is "10 years ago stuff" and
> points to util-linux's switchroot function for how things are supposedly
> to be done today. But, as we look at
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=utils/util-li
On Wed, 11.01.12 15:59, Rainer Gerhards (rgerha...@gmail.com) wrote:
Heya,
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Am 11. Januar 2012 05:19 schrieb Lennart Poettering
> > :
> >>
> >> Compatibility with classic syslog implementations is provided, via a
> >> socket /run/system
On Wed, 11.01.12 11:03, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
>
> 'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 11/01/12 04:19 did gyre and gimble:
> > This release is more kind of a test release, i.e. like you'd place it in
> > your distribution's equivalent of Rawhide, not the kind you'd updat
On Wednesday 2012-01-11 15:26, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>On Wed, 11.01.12 14:44, Jan Engelhardt (jeng...@medozas.de) wrote:
>
>> >> Forcing the use of @ introduces a policy, which should preferably not be
>> >> done. Since programs started from the initrd obviously should be having
>> >> a /pro
On Wed, 11.01.12 08:27, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> Am 11. Januar 2012 08:04 schrieb Michael Biebl :
> >
> > A few observations/questions:
>
> - systemd-journalctl --help
> ...
> -o --output=STRING Change journal output mode (short, short-verbose,
> verbose, export, json)
>
> #
On Wed, 11.01.12 08:04, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> Am 11. Januar 2012 05:19 schrieb Lennart Poettering :
> > This is the first release with the journal. The journal replaces both
>
> A few observations/questions:
> - How can I check if XZ compression is enabled for the journal f
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 11. Januar 2012 05:19 schrieb Lennart Poettering :
>>
>> Compatibility with classic syslog implementations is provided, via a
>> socket /run/systemd/journal/syslog, to which all messages are forwarded,
>
> Most systems setup rsyslog to use
On Wed, 11.01.12 07:20, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> Am 11. Januar 2012 05:19 schrieb Lennart Poettering :
> >
> > Compatibility with classic syslog implementations is provided, via a
> > socket /run/systemd/journal/syslog, to which all messages are forwarded,
>
> Most systems set
On Wed, 11.01.12 12:46, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
>
> 'Twas brillig, and Mike Kazantsev at 11/01/12 12:13 did gyre and gimble:
> > On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:24:51 +
> > Colin Guthrie wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've got some users with fuse based sshfs mounts in their fstab
'Twas brillig, and Karel Zak at 11/01/12 12:13 did gyre and gimble:
> man fstab:
>
> mount(8) and umount(8) support filesystem subtypes. The subtype is
> defined by '.subtype' suffix. For example 'fuse.sshfs'. It's
> recommended to use subtype notation rather than add any prefix to
> the
On Wed, 11.01.12 14:00, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
>
> 'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 11/01/12 13:42 did gyre and gimble:
> > i.e. there are a number of processes from the initrd which stick
> > around during normal operation which are still to be killed in the
> > kill
On Wed, 11.01.12 14:44, Jan Engelhardt (jeng...@medozas.de) wrote:
> >> Forcing the use of @ introduces a policy, which should preferably not be
> >> done. Since programs started from the initrd obviously should be having
> >> a /proc/*/{cwd,exe} symlinks pointing to the initramfs vfsmount.
> >
'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 11/01/12 13:42 did gyre and gimble:
> i.e. there are a number of processes from the initrd which stick
> around during normal operation which are still to be killed in the
> killing spree, most prominently plymouth.
Fair point, but in the plymouth case spec
On Wednesday 2012-01-11 14:42, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>On Wed, 11.01.12 08:21, Jan Engelhardt (jeng...@medozas.de) wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday 2012-01-10 23:24, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> >
>> >http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/RootStorageDaemons
>> >
>> >If you are involved
On Wed, 11.01.12 09:21, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
>
> 'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 10/01/12 22:24 did gyre and gimble:
> > Heya,
> >
> > Since quite some time there have been unresolved issues with certain
> > unkillable storage daemons maintaining the root file sys
On Wed, 11.01.12 08:21, Jan Engelhardt (jeng...@medozas.de) wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday 2012-01-10 23:24, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >
> >http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/RootStorageDaemons
> >
> >If you are involved with early-boot stuff, like building initrds, or are
> >doing stor
'Twas brillig, and Mike Kazantsev at 11/01/12 12:13 did gyre and gimble:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:24:51 +
> Colin Guthrie wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've got some users with fuse based sshfs mounts in their fstab which is
>> messing up their boot.
>>
>> Obviously they can add "noauto" but then the
Hi there,
Trying to chase down my sudden keyring / tmpfile socket death
syndrome ;-) I poked at the tmpfile cleanup code.
With this debug patch:
diff --git a/src/tmpfiles.c b/src/tmpfiles.c
index 21bf44d..92082e4 100644
--- a/src/tmpfiles.c
+++ b/src/tmpfiles.c
@@ -133,14 +133,19
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:21:30 +
Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 10/01/12 22:24 did gyre and gimble:
> > Heya,
> >
> > Since quite some time there have been unresolved issues with certain
> > unkillable storage daemons maintaining the root file system's storage
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:24:51 +
Colin Guthrie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got some users with fuse based sshfs mounts in their fstab which is
> messing up their boot.
>
> Obviously they can add "noauto" but then their argument is that they do
> want them to be automatically mounted... I'm sure the
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:24:51AM +, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> I've got some users with fuse based sshfs mounts in their fstab which is
> messing up their boot.
>
> Obviously they can add "noauto" but then their argument is that they do
> want them to be automatically mounted... I'm sure there a
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Tom Gundersen at 02/01/12 23:28 did gyre and gimble:
>> The 'Age' filed only makes sense when used together with 'D', as
>> 'd' does not delete any files.
>>
>> Change all entries with a non-empty Age field from 'd' to 'D'
'Twas brillig, and Tom Gundersen at 02/01/12 23:28 did gyre and gimble:
> The 'Age' filed only makes sense when used together with 'D', as
> 'd' does not delete any files.
>
> Change all entries with a non-empty Age field from 'd' to 'D'.
I'm pretty sure Lennart promised to merge this kind of pat
'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 11/01/12 04:19 did gyre and gimble:
> This release is more kind of a test release, i.e. like you'd place it in
> your distribution's equivalent of Rawhide, not the kind you'd update
> your released distro with. We hope to stabilize things in the next
> comin
Hi,
I've got some users with fuse based sshfs mounts in their fstab which is
messing up their boot.
Obviously they can add "noauto" but then their argument is that they do
want them to be automatically mounted... I'm sure there are other ways
to solve this, but by the same token, there already ex
'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 10/01/12 22:24 did gyre and gimble:
> Heya,
>
> Since quite some time there have been unresolved issues with certain
> unkillable storage daemons maintaining the root file system's storage
> backing. To clear this up we have discussed the situation with a c
32 matches
Mail list logo
