Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-journal

2012-03-21 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 21.03.12 20:47, David Lambert (d...@lambsys.com) wrote: > I am still having problems with being unable to control the growth > the systemd journal log files, despite various attempts at imposing > limits in systemd-journald.conf (attached). As I am running on an > extremely resource limite

[systemd-devel] systemd-journal

2012-03-21 Thread David Lambert
I am still having problems with being unable to control the growth the systemd journal log files, despite various attempts at imposing limits in systemd-journald.conf (attached). As I am running on an extremely resource limited embedded system, I would like to know if there is any other way to

Re: [systemd-devel] pam_systemd.so and su

2012-03-21 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 22.03.12 00:41, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote: > On Sun, 18.03.12 16:08, Canek Peláez Valdés (can...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > Hi; I'm using systemd 43 in Gentoo, and I usally have this line at the > > end of /etc/pam.d/system-auth: > > > > -sessionoptional

Re: [systemd-devel] Right way to do kexec

2012-03-21 Thread Mirco Tischler
Am 22. März 2012 01:38 schrieb Marti Raudsepp : > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 02:16, Mirco Tischler wrote: >> Unless you want to use kexec on panic. In that case the kexec kernel >> should be loaded at boot, doesn't it? But I don't know if this is >> actually in use or more a debugging tool for kernel

Re: [systemd-devel] Right way to do kexec

2012-03-21 Thread Marti Raudsepp
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 02:16, Mirco Tischler wrote: > Unless you want to use kexec on panic. In that case the kexec kernel > should be loaded at boot, doesn't it? But I don't know if this is > actually in use or more a debugging tool for kernel devs. Sure, the crashdump kernel is loaded with 'ke

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] fsck: remove distro specific guards on forcefsck/fastboot

2012-03-21 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sun, 18.03.12 23:20, Dave Reisner (d...@falconindy.com) wrote: > It's not really clear why these were guarded to begin with, but given > that they're opt in, it doesn't really make much sense. Give everyone > the benefit of these commandline parameters. Hmm, they only exist for compat reasons

Re: [systemd-devel] PATCH: fix sparse warnings

2012-03-21 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 16.03.12 14:32, Frederic Crozat (fcro...@suse.com) wrote: > Le mercredi 14 mars 2012 à 11:36 -0700, Josh Triplett a écrit : > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 06:58:32PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > On Wed, 07.03.12 06:34, Josh Triplett (j...@joshtriplett.org) wrote: > > > > I've attach

Re: [systemd-devel] Right way to do kexec

2012-03-21 Thread Mirco Tischler
Am 22. März 2012 00:33 schrieb Lennart Poettering : > On Wed, 21.03.12 12:24, Marti Raudsepp (ma...@juffo.org) wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've been trying to figure out how to use systemd's kexec functionality >> right. >> >> When one runs "systemctl kexec", systemd simply shuts down and >> executes 'k

Re: [systemd-devel] pam_systemd.so and su

2012-03-21 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sun, 18.03.12 16:08, Canek Peláez Valdés (can...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi; I'm using systemd 43 in Gentoo, and I usally have this line at the > end of /etc/pam.d/system-auth: > > -sessionoptionalpam_systemd.so > > When I use su to become root, after logout the following message

Re: [systemd-devel] Right way to do kexec

2012-03-21 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 21.03.12 12:24, Marti Raudsepp (ma...@juffo.org) wrote: > Hi, > > I've been trying to figure out how to use systemd's kexec functionality right. > > When one runs "systemctl kexec", systemd simply shuts down and > executes 'kexec -e'. For this to work, a kexec-able kernel has to be > alr

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH-v4 1/2] systemd: mount the securityfs filesystem at early stage

2012-03-21 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 15.03.12 19:06, Roberto Sassu (roberto.sa...@polito.it) wrote: > The mount of the securityfs filesystem is now performed in the main systemd > executable as it is used by IMA to provide the interface for loading custom > policies. The unit file 'units/sys-kernel-security.mount' has been re

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd and LXC

2012-03-21 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 21.03.12 12:03, Dmitry Rozhkov (dmitry.roj...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to run MeeGo SDK (http://merproject.org) as a LXC container, > but there some complications related to systemd. The default target looks > as follows: > > [Unit] > Description=Non-Graphical Interface > #

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd v44

2012-03-21 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 19.03.12 10:25, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote: > > It used to be NAME_MAX 255 in the past, in earlier days of > > selinux/audit userspace, I think. > > > I think this is a perfectly acceptable number and will satisfy most > cases. Only in the wacky world of MLS where you coul

[systemd-devel] Right way to do kexec

2012-03-21 Thread Marti Raudsepp
Hi, I've been trying to figure out how to use systemd's kexec functionality right. When one runs "systemctl kexec", systemd simply shuts down and executes 'kexec -e'. For this to work, a kexec-able kernel has to be already loaded. Now, when do I load this kernel? Loading at startup means that I'

[systemd-devel] systemd and LXC

2012-03-21 Thread Dmitry Rozhkov
Hi, I'm trying to run MeeGo SDK (http://merproject.org) as a LXC container, but there some complications related to systemd. The default target looks as follows: [Unit] Description=Non-Graphical Interface #Requires=multi-user.target #After=multi-user.target Requires=systemd-logind.service Conflic