[systemd-devel] Integrating better with systemd

2012-03-25 Thread Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)
For a while now, I've been experiencing a few woes related to systemd, booting with ZFS on the root, underlied by dm-crypt, and my generator-based approach. Here is the ideal situation I would like to have: During initramfs: - decrypt all available initial volumes (done by Fedora) - import ZFS

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-logind.service failed

2012-03-25 Thread Kay Sievers
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 22:02, Sven Anders wrote: > I'm trying to switch to systemd, but I have some minor problem. > > "systemctl status systemd-logind.service" reports failure. > The error message is the following: > > Linux/OS (d-login)[206]: Failed at step CAPABILITIES... > > I made a strace o

Re: [systemd-devel] Fwd: creating dynamic access control lists for a device: systemd and udev

2012-03-25 Thread Ian Malone
On 25 March 2012 19:50, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 20:31, Ian Malone wrote: >> Hi, I've posted this to the Fedora developers list, but maybe it's >> more appropriate here. Since writing it I've confirmed the uaccess TAG >> does what I expect, but I'm not sure having that set dir

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-logind.service failed

2012-03-25 Thread shawn
On Sun, 2012-03-25 at 22:02 +0200, Sven Anders wrote: > Hello! > > I'm trying to switch to systemd, but I have some minor problem. > > "systemctl status systemd-logind.service" reports failure. > The error message is the following: > > Linux/OS (d-login)[206]: Failed at step CAPABILITIES... >

[systemd-devel] systemd-logind.service failed

2012-03-25 Thread Sven Anders
Hello! I'm trying to switch to systemd, but I have some minor problem. "systemctl status systemd-logind.service" reports failure. The error message is the following: Linux/OS (d-login)[206]: Failed at step CAPABILITIES... I made a strace on systemd and it seems, that the following call fails: p

Re: [systemd-devel] Fwd: creating dynamic access control lists for a device: systemd and udev

2012-03-25 Thread Kay Sievers
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 20:31, Ian Malone wrote: > Hi, I've posted this to the Fedora developers list, but maybe it's > more appropriate here. Since writing it I've confirmed the uaccess TAG > does what I expect, but I'm not sure having that set directly by the > device rule would be approved in a

[systemd-devel] Fwd: creating dynamic access control lists for a device: systemd and udev

2012-03-25 Thread Ian Malone
Hi, I've posted this to the Fedora developers list, but maybe it's more appropriate here. Since writing it I've confirmed the uaccess TAG does what I expect, but I'm not sure having that set directly by the device rule would be approved in a package to include in Fedora. -- Forwarded messa