Stef Bon writes:
> That's why I advise to use a pidfile systemd can watch.
I believe one of systemd's design goals is to actually get rid of pid
files and related hacks. If I want to use systemd with a pidfile, I may
just as well use systemd's sysvinit compatibility layer and stick with
my tradit
On Tue, 24.04.12 15:23, shawn (shawnland...@gmail.com) wrote:
> if you have a nested ID_AUTOSEAT tags does it ignore the child tags? or
> do those get excluded from the parent and put in their own seat?
>
> Is there documentation for this I missed?
What precisely do you mean by "nested" ID_AUTOS
On Wed, 25.04.12 09:57, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> > Is there any defined strategy for tidying up the
> > /tmp/systemd-namespace-* folders (other than /tmp on tmpfs)?
> >
> > Nothing seems to be shipped by default in the tmpfil
On Wed, 25.04.12 09:34, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any defined strategy for tidying up the
> /tmp/systemd-namespace-* folders (other than /tmp on tmpfs)?
>
> Nothing seems to be shipped by default in the tmpfiles.d stuff and it
> should really be on service st
On Thu, 26.04.12 21:10, ZiQiang Huan (hzqh...@gmail.com) wrote:
> hi, everyone,
> I try to write a systemd service just like below:
> [Unit]
> Description=service for telnetd
> Wants=syslog.target
syslog.target is not really necessary anymore these days.
>
> [Service]
> ExecStart=/usr/bin/busyb
On Wed, 02.05.12 16:53, David Strauss (da...@davidstrauss.net) wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > But if you want that you can do that simply by enabling
> > NetworkManager-wait-online.service, which then delays
> > network.target accordingly.
>
> That w
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> But if you want that you can do that simply by enabling
> NetworkManager-wait-online.service, which then delays
> network.target accordingly.
That would work, but it has potential undesirable effects:
* Any services associated with net
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:40 PM, David Strauss wrote:
> I would consider adding a script that fires
> network-fully-up.target once NetworkManager finishes
This actually appears to be a better example, especially for how you'd
adapt the script to handle a connection going down:
http://blog.abdullah
On Wed, 02.05.12 15:40, David Strauss (da...@davidstrauss.net) wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Sebastian Tramp
> wrote:
> > Are there existing service files which solve a similar or the same issue?
>
> You may want a target [1]. There is already a network target, but I
> believe it c
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Sebastian Tramp
wrote:
> Are there existing service files which solve a similar or the same issue?
You may want a target [1]. There is already a network target, but I
believe it comes up before NetworkManager fully initializes all
interfaces. I would consider addin
On Wed, 02.05.12 22:19, Sebastian Tramp (m...@sebastian.tramp.name) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to start some user services which need a working network connection.
> This includes services as
>
> * "fetchmail --idle" to receive mails
> * ssh tunnel with autossh
> * dyndns update
>
> I recently swi
Hi,
I want to start some user services which need a working network connection.
This includes services as
* "fetchmail --idle" to receive mails
* ssh tunnel with autossh
* dyndns update
I recently switched to systemd 44 on arch linux but after one day of try and
error as well as manpage reading
2012/5/2 Nikolaus Rath :
> On 05/02/2012 03:53 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> On Sat, 28.04.12 20:41, Nikolaus Rath (nikol...@rath.org) wrote:
>> automatically, without any manual kludges. We won't support any other
>> hacks in systemd. Sorry.
>
>
> Ah, ok. Mounting with /bin/mount -t works just
On 05/02/2012 03:53 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Sat, 28.04.12 20:41, Nikolaus Rath (nikol...@rath.org) wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am struggling to come up with the correct way to define a unit
>> configuration for a FUSE based network file system.
>>
>> Generally, the file system needs to b
On Sat, 28.04.12 20:41, Nikolaus Rath (nikol...@rath.org) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am struggling to come up with the correct way to define a unit
> configuration for a FUSE based network file system.
>
> Generally, the file system needs to be mounted and unmounted with its
> own programs (rather th
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Stef Bon wrote:
> 2012/4/29 Nikolaus Rath :
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am struggling to come up with the correct way to define a unit
> > configuration for a FUSE based network file system.
> >
> > Generally, the file system needs to be mounted and unmounted with its
> >
2012/5/2 Lennart Poettering :
>> (autofs_ptype_expire_direct). Is this on purpose?
>> I see a timeout set, so I guess it was the intention to handle the
>> expire.
>
> We currently don't do expiration, since this wasn't intended as a full
> autofs implementation, but just a way to parallelize and d
On Wed, 02.05.12 07:45, Stef Bon (stef...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been looking into the code how systemd handles the automounting.
Heya,
> I've got two issues:
>
> a. I've found the handling of the "missing" packet
> (autofs_ptype_missing_direct), which triggers the
> mounting. But I
2012/4/29 Nikolaus Rath :
> Hello,
>
> I am struggling to come up with the correct way to define a unit
> configuration for a FUSE based network file system.
>
> Generally, the file system needs to be mounted and unmounted with its
> own programs (rather than with mount and umount). The main reason
19 matches
Mail list logo
