Comments welcome (please reply here):
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/socketactivation
--
David Strauss
| da...@davidstrauss.net
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
2012/10/17 Lennart Poettering :
> On Wed, 17.10.12 14:16, Lukáš Nykrýn (lnyk...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> Today I have read this bug
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866693 and described
>> systemd-tmpfiles behavior look pretty wrong to me, but I am not sure how
>> to fix it.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Wed, 17.10.12 14:16, Lukáš Nykrýn (lnyk...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> Today I have read this bug
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866693 and described
>> systemd-tmpfiles behavior look pretty wrong to me, but I am
On Wed, 17.10.12 14:16, Lukáš Nykrýn (lnyk...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Hello,
> Today I have read this bug
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866693 and described
> systemd-tmpfiles behavior look pretty wrong to me, but I am not sure how
> to fix it. Some ideas cross my mind; moving systemd
Dear Lennart & Matthew,
after taking some time to wrap my mind around the %I mechanism, I came
to the conclusion that a service file written by Matthew is the most
pragmatic while still flexible solution for this use case.
Since installing another programme (Plymouth) isn't a true option (and
doe
Hello everybody,
I found a typo in comment. Patch is attached, thanks!
--
main(a){char*c=/*Schoene Gruesse */"B?IJj;MEH"
"CX:;",b;for(a/*Chris get my mail address:*/=0;b=c[a++];)
putchar(b-1/(/* gcc -o sig sig.c && ./sig*/b/42*2-3)*4
Hello everybody,
if 'systemctl enable' (and friends) is run inside chroot it always
exits with a bad return code. unit_file_enable() returns the number of
symlink rules that were supposed to be created. So resetting r to 0 and
exiting gracefully should be the correct way. At least it fixes it for
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 04:43:10PM -0400, Eelco Dolstra wrote:
> If a device unit has aliases defined in udev rules, and there are
> other units that depend on that alias, as in
>
> BindTo=sys-subsystem-net-devices-eth0.device
>
> then systemd will fail the start the alias, and any dependent un
Пересылаемое сообщение
17.10.2012, 16:51, "Dennis Semakin" :
> We actually have a number of definitions like these in
> src/shared/missing.h.
I didn't know, thanks
> How old is your glibc?
2.11.3
It seems that is is very old.
Anyway thanks for your reply. As for patch, I
On Wed, 17.10.12 16:16, Dennis Semakin (insan...@yandex.ru) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently compiling systemd-194.
> Very often I get the error about undeclarated definitions MS_REC, MS_PRIVATE,
> MS_MOVE... in mount func.
> I know that's because of old glibc headers...
> But. may be it would be
Hi,
I'm currently compiling systemd-194.
Very often I get the error about undeclarated definitions MS_REC, MS_PRIVATE,
MS_MOVE... in mount func.
I know that's because of old glibc headers...
But. may be it would be useful to write something like that:
#ifndef MS_REC /* May not be define
Hello,
Today I have read this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866693 and described
systemd-tmpfiles behavior look pretty wrong to me, but I am not sure how
to fix it. Some ideas cross my mind; moving systemd-namespace-*
elsewhere, adding some option to exclude dirs in tmpfiles conf
2012/10/17 Reindl Harald :
> how large is the limit here?
>
> a machine running F17 since this night has a dedicated
> /var/log/ with 1 GB and after send out a small newsletter
> this happens 4 times in "dmesg"
>
> for me it seems the limits are too tight in the case of
> small but dedicated /var/l
how large is the limit here?
a machine running F17 since this night has a dedicated
/var/log/ with 1 GB and after send out a small newsletter
this happens 4 times in "dmesg"
for me it seems the limits are too tight in the case of
small but dedicated /var/log disks
the machine itself is running r
Hi,
Might have been covered elsewhere in some docs but is there any info on
how to plan for a post-pm-utils world?
pm-utils had several quirks (many of which are likely obsolete - for me
the vt switching stuff which is apparently quirked on my h/w makes
suspend/resume uglier and gives no benefit)
On 10/15/2012 05:06 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 15.10.12 11:40, Federico Di Pierro (nierr...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>> I'm using systemd 194 in archlinux. I read that linux 3.6 comes with
>> hybrid-sleep, finally.
>> I only rely on systemd to suspend/hibernate (well i use it togeth
16 matches
Mail list logo
