Re: [systemd-devel] systemd195: issue with udev launched script

2012-11-15 Thread Warpme
On 11/15/12 9:05 PM, Kay Sievers wrote: On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Warpme wrote: Sometime ago upgraded my ArchLinux (kernel3.3.8) server to systemd195. Today I discovered that my backup procedure fails. It was working OK with previous systemd. Forgive me if this forum is wrong place to as

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd195: issue with udev launched script

2012-11-15 Thread Kay Sievers
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Warpme wrote: > Sometime ago upgraded my ArchLinux (kernel3.3.8) server to systemd195. > Today I discovered that my backup procedure fails. It was working OK with > previous systemd. > Forgive me if this forum is wrong place to ask such questions, but as udev > is

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd195: issue with udev launched script

2012-11-15 Thread Dave Reisner
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 07:40:19PM +0100, Warpme wrote: > Hi * > > Sometime ago upgraded my ArchLinux (kernel3.3.8) server to systemd195. > Today I discovered that my backup procedure fails. It was working OK > with previous systemd. > Forgive me if this forum is wrong place to ask such questions,

[systemd-devel] systemd195: issue with udev launched script

2012-11-15 Thread Warpme
Hi * Sometime ago upgraded my ArchLinux (kernel3.3.8) server to systemd195. Today I discovered that my backup procedure fails. It was working OK with previous systemd. Forgive me if this forum is wrong place to ask such questions, but as udev is now part of systemd - I decided to ask here... I

Re: [systemd-devel] segfault in hwdb

2012-11-15 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 05:34:08PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > Something like this appeared with latest git: > > > > Nov 15 16:55:46 fedora-15 systemd-udevd[334]: worker [364] terminated by > > signal 11 (Segmentation fault

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] cgroup: look up user session units from cgroups as well.

2012-11-15 Thread Mirco Tischler
2012/11/15 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 01:07:26AM +0100, Mirco Tischler wrote: > > This allows the journal code to set the _SYSTEMD_UNIT tag for messages > generated > > by systemd --user session units. > Hi, > this would open the door to spoofed messages. Previously Len

Re: [systemd-devel] segfault in hwdb

2012-11-15 Thread Kay Sievers
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Something like this appeared with latest git: > > Nov 15 16:55:46 fedora-15 systemd-udevd[334]: worker [364] terminated by > signal 11 (Segmentation fault) > Nov 15 16:55:46 fedora-15 [387]: Process 364 (systemd-udevd) dumped c

[systemd-devel] segfault in hwdb

2012-11-15 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Something like this appeared with latest git: Nov 15 16:55:46 fedora-15 systemd-udevd[334]: worker [364] terminated by signal 11 (Segmentation fault) Nov 15 16:55:46 fedora-15 [387]: Process 364 (systemd-udevd) dumped core. Nov 15 16:55:46 fedora-15 systemd-udevd[334]: worker [364] failed while

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Highlight ordering cycle deletions

2012-11-15 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On 11/05/2012 12:28 AM, Olivier Brunel wrote: > Having unit(s) removed/not started, even if it solved the issue and allowed > to boot successfully, should still be considered an error, as something > clearly isn't right. > > This patch elevates the log message from warning to error, and adds a sta

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] journalctl: require argument for --priority

2012-11-15 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On 11/15/2012 12:17 PM, Lekensteyn wrote: > This fixes a segfault due to a missing value for --priority. -p is > unaffected because it is specified in the getopt_long parameter list. > --- > src/journal/journalctl.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Applied. Zbyszek

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/6] Fix %h, %s, %p handling in templates in user session

2012-11-15 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On 11/03/2012 08:51 PM, Oleksii Shevchuk wrote: Hi, I now applied 1/6, 2/6, 4/6 of the series. The rest are enhancements, I'm not sure what is Lennart's long term plan here, so I'm leaving them alone for now. Zbyszek ___ systemd-devel mailing list syste

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 2/2] sched: Only setting CPUSchedulingPriority=rr doesn't work

2012-11-15 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On 11/01/2012 06:48 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > From: Holger Hans Peter Freyther > > A service that only sets the scheduling policy to round-robin > fails to be started. This is because the cpu_sched_priority is > initialized to 0 and is not adjusted when the policy is changed. > > C

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Fix a fatal dbus abort in bus_manager_message_handler()

2012-11-15 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On 10/31/2012 02:09 PM, Colin Walters wrote: > On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 13:53 +0100, Eelco Dolstra wrote: > >> Oops, you're right. Searching for calls to dbus_message_unref I mistook the >> "oom" label in message_from_file_changes() for the one in >> bus_manager_message_handler(). So this one shoul

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] cgroup: look up user session units from cgroups as well.

2012-11-15 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 01:07:26AM +0100, Mirco Tischler wrote: > This allows the journal code to set the _SYSTEMD_UNIT tag for messages > generated > by systemd --user session units. Hi, this would open the door to spoofed messages. Previously Lennart suggested [1] using _SYSTEMD_USER_UNIT=. Zby

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] journalctl: require argument for --priority

2012-11-15 Thread Lekensteyn
This fixes a segfault due to a missing value for --priority. -p is unaffected because it is specified in the getopt_long parameter list. --- src/journal/journalctl.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/journal/journalctl.c b/src/journal/journalctl.c index cccd8a

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] inhibit: ellipsize WHAT

2012-11-15 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 09:37:38PM +, Shawn Landden wrote: > +ewhat= ellipsize(what,21, 66); Hi, I think that your patch goes in the right direction, but we should look at the history that systemctl underwent in its output and learn from that. Fixed sizes are always going to s